[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] RDS Scope Guidance

[Stephanie Perrin]

Hazy memory says yes, I would have to go back and check.  I think it was 
Metalitz.....

i agree with your concerns....it will be hard to do this in 6 months, 
without just saying yup they did what they said they would.  It is not 
clear to me that they did....

SP


On 2017-02-20 19:05, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> It is interesting to read that the call may be re-opened yet again for 
> volunteers to serve on the Review team; my understanding was that it 
> had been re-opened three times already.
>
> I would prefer that a comprehensive Review be undertaken, but I 
> appreciate it may not be the best allocation of the community’s 
> resources. For that reason, I’m okay with a condensed timeline as long 
> as we are not glazing over important issues that should indeed be 
> reviewed. That said, I'm not entirely clear on what is in-scope as 
> part of the compressed and comprehensive Review options — it would be 
> useful if Staff could prepare a comparison table which clarifies what 
> would be in-scope for each option.
>
> What I don’t want is for the Review team to be brought onboard for six 
> months and rushed to reach or (re)affirm a pre-determined conclusion. 
> I worry about this when I see sentences like, “The scope be limited to 
> “post mortem” of implementation results of the previous WHOIS review 
> recommendations.” That sounds very restrictive to me.
>
> I thought IPC or someone else said a few months ago that a condensed 
> Review would not be in line with the Bylaws. I can’t remember where I 
> read or heard this (it is also possible that I am imagining it) – does 
> anyone else remember this being raised?
>
> - Ayden
>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] RDS Scope Guidance
>> Local Time: 20 February 2017 11:15 PM
>> UTC Time: 20 February 2017 23:15
>> From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>> To: ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>, Kathy Kleiman 
>> <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
>>
>>
>> Please note this is our last kick at this can.  I really don't have 
>> much guidance; I don't quite understand exactly what we are going to 
>> study.....but I like the idea of 6 months. Copying Kathy who 
>> co-chaired the last one, she is most likely to be able to figure out 
>> if this will work....
>>
>> Stephanie
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject:
>> 	[council] RDS Scope Guidance
>> Date:
>> 	Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:31:56 +0000
>> From:
>> 	James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>
>> To:
>> 	GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> Councilors –
>>
>>
>> Attached, please find a draft RDS Scope Guidance document, which 
>> consolidates the feedback received from all SOs and ACs on 
>> guidance/recommendations to limit the scope of the upcoming RDS 
>> (WHOIS) review.  Time is tight, so if you have any comments or edits, 
>> please respond by *2000 UTC this Friday 24 FEB.*
>>
>>
>> Once completed, the RDS Scope Guidance document will be distributed 
>> to RDS Review Team applicants, to confirm that they are still 
>> interested in serving on this review team.  There is also a proposal 
>> to extend the call for applications until 7 MAR.
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>>
>> J.
>>
>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170220/b9c9b487/attachment.htm>