<div>It is interesting
to read that the call may be re-opened yet again for volunteers to serve on the
Review team; my understanding was that it had been re-opened three times
already.<br><br>I would prefer
that a comprehensive Review be undertaken, but I appreciate it may not be the
best allocation of the community’s resources. For that reason, I’m okay with a
condensed timeline as long as we are not glazing over important issues that
should indeed be reviewed. That said, I'm not entirely clear on what is in-scope as part of the compressed and comprehensive Review options — it would be useful if Staff could prepare a comparison table which clarifies what would be in-scope for each option.<br><br>What I don’t
want is for the Review team to be brought onboard for six months and rushed to
reach or (re)affirm a pre-determined conclusion. I worry about this when I see
sentences like, “The scope be limited to “post mortem” of implementation
results of the previous WHOIS review recommendations.” That sounds very
restrictive to me.<br><br>I thought IPC or
someone else said a few months ago that a condensed Review would not be in line
with the Bylaws. I can’t remember where I read or heard this (it is also possible that I am
imagining it) – does anyone else remember this being raised?<br><br>- Ayden<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite" class="protonmail_quote"><div>-------- Original Message --------<br></div><div>Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] RDS Scope Guidance<br></div><div>Local Time: 20 February 2017 11:15 PM<br></div><div>UTC Time: 20 February 2017 23:15<br></div><div>From: stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca<br></div><div>To: ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc@lists.ncsg.is>, Kathy Kleiman <kathy@kathykleiman.com><br></div><div><br></div><div> <br></div><p><span class="size" style="font-size:undefinedpx"><span class="font" style="font-family:Lucida Grande">Please note this is
our last kick at this can. I really don't have much guidance;
I don't quite understand exactly what we are going to study.....but
I like the idea of 6 months. Copying Kathy who co-chaired the
last one, she is most likely to be able to figure out if this
will work....</span></span><br></p><p><span class="size" style="font-size:undefinedpx"><span class="font" style="font-family:Lucida Grande">Stephanie</span></span><br></p><div class="moz-forward-container"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>-------- Forwarded Message --------<br></div><table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Subject:<br></th><td>[council] RDS Scope Guidance<br></td></tr><tr><th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Date:<br></th><td>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:31:56 +0000<br></td></tr><tr><th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">From:<br></th><td>James M. Bladel <a rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com"><jbladel@godaddy.com></a><br></td></tr><tr><th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">To:<br></th><td>GNSO Council List <a rel="noreferrer nofollow noopener" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:council@gnso.icann.org"><council@gnso.icann.org></a><br></td></tr></tbody></table><div><br></div><div><br></div><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Councilors –</span><br></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span><br></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Attached,
please find a draft RDS Scope Guidance document, which
consolidates the feedback received from all SOs and ACs on
guidance/recommendations to limit the scope of the upcoming
RDS (WHOIS) review. Time is tight, so if you have any
comments or edits, please respond by <b>2000 UTC this
Friday 24 FEB.</b></span><br></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span><br></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Once
completed, the RDS Scope Guidance document will be
distributed to RDS Review Team applicants, to confirm that
they are still interested in serving on this review team.
There is also a proposal to extend the call for applications
until 7 MAR.</span><br></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span><br></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size" style="font-size:11pt">Thank you,</span><br></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span><br></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size" style="font-size:11pt">J.</span><br></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span><br></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size" style="font-size:11pt"> </span><br></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>