[NCSG-PC] CCWG-IG motion amendments

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi all,

the deadline for submission is this monday. please send your comments asap.
I will submit the current proposal by the deadline.

Best,

Rafik

2017-08-10 10:54 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:

> Hi Stephanie,
>
> if you recall in Hyderabad, Council asked the working group to align
> itself with the uniform framework for CCWG. the working group did a review
> of its charter and amended following the framework model (using a charter
> template). the amended charter was submitted in Copenhagen meeting.
>
> several councilors are still not satisfied with that and the request now
> with this motion is to suggest a new vehicle which is not CCWG but
> responding to other requirements and improving accountability and reporting
> mechanisms, also about submitting positions on behalf of the community and
> how to come back to charter organizations.
>
> The working group had a discussion of the matter and we think we can found
> out a new structure having a cross-community structure but not necessarily
> a CCWG. There is no model yet and the working group will be tasked to make
> a proposal. GNSO created previously several structures such as standing
> committee etc (a long list), so the CCWG-IG will end up a new one to the
> GNSO structures fauna. basically, it will be like a CCWG, behaving as CCWG
> but not having the name of CCWG...
>
> to be more candid and more direct,  several groups within GNSO are
> concerned that CCWG becomes more and more the model for any work including
> PDP. you can see similar concerns about the subpro WG working track 5
> on geonames.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> ps I changed the permissions in the google doc, you should be able to
> comment there
>
>
> 2017-08-10 10:34 GMT+09:00 Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.
> utoronto.ca>:
>
>> There is a typo in the thrid para, amtrying to get edit access to fix a
>> few things.  More important question is exactly what model did we have in
>> mind, if not a CCWG???
>>
>> cheers Steph
>>
>> On 2017-08-09 20:31, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> are you ok with the proposed amendments https://docs.google.com/docume
>> nt/d/1LQWVaEgppF38Gvnm9SpvftHpdhI1BOGdRdl_YyBe3oA/edit? we should submit
>> them by the deadline Monday 14th August to be taken into account.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2017-07-14 8:32 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> as you know, we asked for the CCWG-IG motion to be deferred so we can
>>> continue working on our amendments. that was supported by other groups like
>>> IPC due to the short time we had since Johannesburg meeting.
>>>
>>> Marilia, Farzaneh and I worked on making some amendments to the motion
>>> as follow-up of our NCSG Policy call this week https://docs.google.com/d
>>> ocument/d/1LQWVaEgppF38Gvnm9SpvftHpdhI1BOGdRdl_YyBe3oA/edit
>>>
>>> we are sharing this so we can discuss them. we will also share them with
>>> the wider NCSG list.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170814/e315cc95/attachment.htm>