[NCSG-PC] Fw: Re: Sessions in Johannesburg?

[Tapani Tarvainen]

Hi Farzaneh,

That sounds good to me.

Tapani

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 03:04:05PM -0400, farzaneh badii (farzaneh.badii at gmail.com) wrote:
> 
> Hi Kathy, all,
> 
> Actually  it might make more sense to have NCSG meetings and not have
> separate NCUC meetings. Because from the schedule I see, we cannot possibly
> have meetings that do not conflict.
> 
> I think Tapani wanted the slots for Outreach policy practice in the
> morning. which starts at 8.00 AM. If we can have 1 hour of those every day
> and prepare people for the rest of the day that would be good. We might
> have to just do 30 minutes lunch breaks (as instructed by the planning
> team) to either strategize for the afternoon or meet with other groups.
> 
> I talked to EC members and they don't mind merging with NCSG. I might
> reserve a 30 minutes lunch break for an informal meeting with some of the
> board memebers but other than that I think we will be ok if NCSG can submit
> :
> 
> One hour morning sessions (outreach and policy strategy)
> 
> 30 minutes during lunch breaks
> 
> If Tapani and the rest agree with that I will not ask for separate time
> slots for NCUC.
> 
> 
> Farzaneh
> 
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Observer too to Farzi's important suggestion -- with follow-up.
> >
> > Quick thought that we might want to have a longer NCUC/NCSG prep meeting
> > (for all NCSG attendees) early on in the meeting. It would be good to have
> > an arc of all the issues in Jo'burg we should be thinking about -- and give
> > people some time to think, research and read for a day before jumping into
> > a WG discussion.
> >
> > - So 30 minute AM meetings for the daily briefing
> >
> > - Occasional lunch sessions, including one with Board members
> >
> > - An initial hour meeting at the very start (Monday AM?) to provide an arc
> > of the issues we need to work on together in this meeting.
> >
> > Best, Kathy
> >
> > On 4/25/2017 2:19 PM, farzaneh badii wrote:
> >
> > Hello PC
> >
> > Observer here: for NCUC, not to make a very busy schedule
> > unnecessarily busier, I will send requests for 30 minutes morning sessions
> > and 45 minutes lunch break sessions. Since I will not be there I would like
> > some of the NCUC members on NCSG PC members to lead the discussions and
> > prepare our members for each day. We might also arrange a 45 minutes board
> > meeting for NCUC during a lunch break.Please keep this in mind before
> > submitting your requests, we don't want to have schedule conflicts with
> > NCSG. If you want to also have similar half an hour morning sessions on
> > policy strategy and outreach, let me know perhaps just joining NCSG meeting
> > in the morning is wiser.
> >
> > Farzaneh
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <
> > ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm fine with an extra PC session - at least we can ask.
> >>
> >> Could somebody come up with a title and description for it?
> >>
> >> Deadline is tomorrow, and I'll be traveling most of the day,
> >> like today (now in train) - I'll finalize this tomorrow evening.
> >>
> >> Tapani
> >>
> >> On Apr 25 17:59, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Ayden,
> >> >
> >> > yes, we can do that. It is at the end a policy forum so discussing the
> >> > scheduled topics and sessions, and planning response to public comments
> >> and
> >> > positions makes sense.
> >> > I assume that should be on the last day so can we have it as kind of
> >> > wrap-up session.
> >> > Best,
> >> >
> >> > Rafik
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2017-04-25 17:21 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:
> >> >
> >> > > Resending this, as the PC list dropped off inadvertently.
> >> > >
> >> > > - Ayden
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > -------- Original Message --------
> >> > > Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Sessions in Johannesburg?
> >> > > Local Time: 25 April 2017 9:20 AM
> >> > > UTC Time: 25 April 2017 08:20
> >> > > From: icann at ferdeline.com
> >> > > To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > While I am open to meeting with other groups if time permits, I am
> >> > > wondering if it might be more useful having two PC meetings --- one of
> >> > > which could be solely for discussing upcoming public comments,
> >> allocating
> >> > > them, and formulating our positions?
> >> > >
> >> > > Best wishes,
> >> > >
> >> > > Ayden