[PC-NCSG] Policy call time

[David Cake]

If its already been circulated to the general NCSG list, I have no issue with appointing from those who have shown interest already. 

David

> On 1 Sep 2016, at 7:12 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On Sep 1, 2016, at 4:01 AM, David Cake <dave at davecake.net <mailto:dave at davecake.net>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 1 Sep 2016, at 6:01 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net <mailto:egmorris1 at toast.net>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Amr,
>>>  
>>> Thanks for this.
>>>  
>>> In fairness to everyone, including both constituencies,
>> 
>> 	While of course both constituencies have reps on the PC, a public call on the NCSG list sounds like a sensible idea that should have been done a couple of weeks ago. 
> 
> Agreed David. However, since we?re playing catch-up, I was wondering how the PC felt about, specifically, the GNSO Review WG. There was a call for volunteers for this WG, which was circulated twice to NCSG-DISCUSS, once by Maryam, and once by Renata, but we didn?t get too many takers.
> 
> So I was wondering whether we should appoint from those who have already shown interest, and signed up, or send another call for volunteers to the list.
> 
> I?m really fine whichever way we go at this point, as long as we get it done?, quickly.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Amr

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160901/b942a522/attachment.html>