[PC-NCSG] Policy call time

Amr Elsadr aelsadr
Thu Sep 1 14:12:06 EEST 2016


Hi,

> On Sep 1, 2016, at 4:01 AM, David Cake <dave at davecake.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 1 Sep 2016, at 6:01 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net <mailto:egmorris1 at toast.net>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Amr,
>>  
>> Thanks for this.
>>  
>> In fairness to everyone, including both constituencies,
> 
> 	While of course both constituencies have reps on the PC, a public call on the NCSG list sounds like a sensible idea that should have been done a couple of weeks ago. 

Agreed David. However, since we?re playing catch-up, I was wondering how the PC felt about, specifically, the GNSO Review WG. There was a call for volunteers for this WG, which was circulated twice to NCSG-DISCUSS, once by Maryam, and once by Renata, but we didn?t get too many takers.

So I was wondering whether we should appoint from those who have already shown interest, and signed up, or send another call for volunteers to the list.

I?m really fine whichever way we go at this point, as long as we get it done?, quickly.

Thanks.

Amr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160901/7681315b/attachment.html>



More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list