[PC-NCSG] Policy call time

[Marilia Maciel]

Hello Amr and David,

It was also my first reaction that we could choose among those that
expressed interest in an individual capacity. However, on second though,
 these people signed up to follow the discussions, they did not sign up for
the additional burden to represent NCSG there, which may entail additional
work, such as reporting, seeking input from the group, facilitating NCSG's
input into the process if needed, etc. Therefore, I tend to think (although
open to be convinced otherwise) that we should issue a call.

Best,
Marilia

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:12 PM, David Cake <dave at davecake.net> wrote:

> If its already been circulated to the general NCSG list, I have no issue
> with appointing from those who have shown interest already.
>
> David
>
> On 1 Sep 2016, at 7:12 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at egyptig.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sep 1, 2016, at 4:01 AM, David Cake <dave at davecake.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 1 Sep 2016, at 6:01 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Amr,
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> In fairness to everyone, including both constituencies,
>
>
> While of course both constituencies have reps on the PC, a public call on
> the NCSG list sounds like a sensible idea that should have been done a
> couple of weeks ago.
>
>
> Agreed David. However, since we?re playing catch-up, I was wondering how
> the PC felt about, specifically, the GNSO Review WG. There was a call for
> volunteers for this WG, which was circulated twice to NCSG-DISCUSS, once by
> Maryam, and once by Renata, but we didn?t get too many takers.
>
> So I was wondering whether we should appoint from those who have already
> shown interest, and signed up, or send another call for volunteers to the
> list.
>
> I?m really fine whichever way we go at this point, as long as we get it
> done?, quickly.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20160901/59921279/attachment.html>