[PC-NCSG] Fwd: [council] FW: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review
Wendy Seltzer
wendy
Fri Nov 18 23:35:10 EET 2016
On 11/18/2016 04:16 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
> How do we feel about this, gang? I will see if I can dig up the
> original document and forward, notice where it is coming from....
I suggest opposing at least the limited selection criteria for
participation:
"Requesting that the SO/AC leadership select (following the new Bylaws)
a small group of review team members that have either participated in,
or tracked closely, the 1 st WHOIS Review Team?s Recommendation."
Limited overlap with other efforts may be appropriate, but "we go back
to our friends and ask them how they think they did" is not.
--Wendy
>
> Stephanie
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: [council] FW: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review
> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:13:13 +0000
> From: James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>
> To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
>
>
> Council colleagues ?
>
> See message below, and attached document from Margie. I know some
> (Susan?) have raised concerns with the draft Limited Scope for RDS
> Review, but do we think it is possible for us to gather and submit our
> feedback by 1 DEC?
>
> Thanks?
>
> J.
>
> *From: *Margie Milam <Margie.Milam at icann.org>
> *Date: *Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 19:55
>
> *Subject: *RE: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review
>
> Dear All,
>
> I understand from conversations in Hyderabad that you may need
> additional time to provide feedback from your SO/AC on the RDS Review
> Limited Scope Proposal.
>
> May I suggest a December 1^st deadline for feedback?
>
> All the best,
>
> Margie
>
> _______
>
> Margie Milam
>
> Vice President
>
> MSSI
>
> ICANN
>
> ________
>
> *From:*Margie Milam
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 03, 2016 5:53 PM
> *Subject:* RE: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review
>
> Dear All-
>
> Here is a clean version of the Limited Scope Proposal, noting the change
> below.
>
> All the best,
>
> Margie
>
> *From:*Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 03, 2016 3:28 PM
> *To:* Margie Milam <Margie.Milam at icann.org>; Chris Disspain
> <chris at disspain.uk>
> *Cc:* Oscar A. Robles-Garay <oscar at lacnic.net>; Thomas Schneider
> <Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch>; Katrina Sataki <katrina at nic.lv>;
> James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>; louie at louie.net; Patrik
> F??ltstr??m <patrik at frobbit.se>; tsinha at umd.edu; bverd at verisign.com;
> bruce.tonkin at melbourneit.com.au; cherine.chalaby at board.icann.org;
> erika at erikamann.com; markus.kummer at board.icann.org;
> steve.crocker at board.icann.org; rinalia.abdulrahim at board.icann.org;
> Rinalia Abdul Rahim (GMAIL) <rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com>; Goran Marby
> <goran.marby at icann.org>; Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund at icann.org>; Cyrus
> Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org>; David Olive <david.olive at icann.org>;
> Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart at icann.org>; Samantha Eisner
> <Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>; Erika Randall <erika.randall at icann.org>;
> Pamela Smith <pamela.smith at icann.org>; Karen Mulberry
> <karen.mulberry at icann.org>; Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
> *Subject:* RE: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review
>
> For those trying to understand the proposal, note that there is an
> extraneous "not" in the 4th sub-bullet of Suggested Approach. It should
> read "... and to the extent that it is found to be insufficient or
> inaccurate...". Or alternately, it could read "... and to the extent
> that it is found to not be sufficient or accurate...".
>
> Alan
>
> At 02/11/2016 05:00 AM, Margie Milam wrote:
>
>
> Hi Chris & All-
>
> It seems the next step would be to determine the level of consensus
> to this draft proposal among the SO/AC leaders. Please kindly use
> the attached document, discuss it with your SO/AC, and reply by
> November 9^th if there are any objections to moving forward with
> this proposal.
>
> All the best,
>
> Margie Milam
>
> *From:* Chris Disspain [mailto:chris at disspain.uk
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 02, 2016 2:02 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review
>
> Sorry for not being clear. I mean what do we now need to do so we
> start to take the next steps?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Chris
>
> On 2 Nov 2016, at 08:30, Margie Milam <Margie.Milam at icann.org
> <mailto:Margie.Milam at icann.org> > wrote:
>
> Hi Chris-
>
> The next steps are listed in the Proposal:
>
> ? Circulate proposal to SO/AC leadership to socialize with their
> respective SO/ACs
>
> ? ; Discuss with Community in Hyderabad at the WHOIS High Interest
> Topic Session
>
> ? SO/AC leadership to issue a public statement or a letter to ICANN
> CEO and Board Chair that explains why limited scope is appropriate
> and articulates that they have broad support of the ICANN community
>
> ? Call for Volunteers to note limited scope & unique expertise sought
>
> ? Reach out to the previous Review Team members and members of the
> Expert Working Group on Registration Directory Services, and
> encourage them to consider applying for the narrow scoped RDS Review
> Team
>
> ? Propose a Charter for the RDS Review Team to adopt that tracks the
> limited Scope
>
> All the best,
>
> Margie
>
> From: Chris Disspain [mailto:chris at disspain.uk]
>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 1:55 PM
>
> To: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam at icann.org
> <mailto:Margie.Milam at icann.org> >
>
> Cc: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
> <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> >; Oscar A. Robles-Garay
> <oscar at lacnic.net <mailto:oscar at lacnic.net>>; Thomas Schneider
> <Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch
> <mailto:Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch>>; Katrina Sataki
> <katrina at nic.lv <mailto:katrina at nic.lv>>; James M. Bladel
> <jbladel at godaddy.com <mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>; louie at louie.net
> <mailto:louie at louie.net>; Patrik F??ltstr??m <patrik at frobbit.se
> <mailto:patrik at frobbit.se>>; tsinha at umd.edu <mailto:tsinha at umd.edu>;
> bverd at verisign.com <mailto:bverd at verisign.com>;
> bruce.tonkin at melbourneit.com.au
> <mailto:bruce.tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>;
> cherine.chalaby at board.icann.org
> <mailto:cherine.chalaby at board.icann.org>; erika at erikamann.com
> <mailto:erika at erikamann.com>; markus.kummer at board.icann.org
> <mailto:markus.kummer at board.icann.org>;
> steve.crocker at board.icann.org
> <mailto:steve.crocker at board.icann.org>;
> rinalia.abdulrahim at board.icann.org
> <mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim at board.icann.org>; Rinalia Abdul Rahim
> (GMAIL) <rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com
> <mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com>>; Goran Marby
> <goran.marby at icann.org <mailto:goran.marby at icann.org>>; Jamie
> Hedlund <jamie.hedlund at icann.org <mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org> >;
> Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org <mailto:cyrus.namazi at icann.org>
> >; David Olive <david.olive at icann.org
> <mailto:david.olive at icann.org>>; Theresa Swinehart
> <theresa.swinehart at icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart at icann.org>>;
> Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner at icann.org
> <mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>>; Erika Randall
> <erika.randall at icann.org <mailto:erika.randall at icann.org> >; Pamela
> Smith <pamela.smith at icann.org <mailto:pamela.smith at icann.org> >;
> Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry at icann.org
> <mailto:karen.mulberry at icann.org> >; Marika Konings
> <marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org> >
>
> Subject: Re: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review
>
> OK??.
>
> What are our next steps please Margie?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
> On 2 Nov 2016, at 08:19, Margie Milam <Margie.Milam at icann.org
> <mailto:Margie.Milam at icann.org> > wrote:
>
> Dear All-
>
> Please see the attached document, which includes Alan???s revision.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Margie
>
> From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
> <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>]
>
> Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 3:42 AM
>
> To: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam at icann.org
> <mailto:Margie.Milam at icann.org> >; chris at disspain.id.au
> <mailto:chris at disspain.id.au>; Oscar A. Robles-Garay
> <oscar at lacnic.net <mailto:oscar at lacnic.net>>; Thomas Schneider
> <Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch
> <mailto:Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch>>; Katrina Sataki
> <katrina at nic.lv <mailto:katrina at nic.lv>>; jbladel at godaddy.com
> <mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>; louie at louie.net
> <mailto:louie at louie.net>; Patrik F????ltstr????m <patrik at frobbit.se
> <mailto:patrik at frobbit.se> >;tsinha at umd.edu <mailto:tsinha at umd.edu>;
> bverd at verisign.com <mailto:bverd at verisign.com>;
> bruce.tonkin at melbourneit.com.au
> <mailto:bruce.tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>;
> cherine.chalaby at board.icann.org
> <mailto:cherine.chalaby at board.icann.org>; erika at erikamann.com
> <mailto:erika at erikamann.com>; markus.kummer at board.icann.org
> <mailto:markus.kummer at board.icann.org>;
> steve.crocker at board.icann.org
> <mailto:steve.crocker at board.icann.org>;
> rinalia.abdulrahim at board.icann.org
> <mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim at board.icann.org>; Rinalia Abdul Rahim
> (GMAIL) <rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com
> <mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com>>; Goran Marby
> <goran.marby at icann.org <mailto:goran.marby at icann.org>>; Chris
> Disspain <chris at disspain.uk <mailto:chris at disspain.uk>>
>
> Cc: Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund at icann.org
> <mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org> >; Cyrus Namazi
> <cyrus.namazi at icann.org <mailto:cyrus.namazi at icann.org> >; David
> Olive <david.olive at icann.org <mailto:david.olive at icann.org>>;
> Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart at icann.org
> <mailto:theresa.swinehart at icann.org>>; Samantha Eisner
> <Samantha.Eisner at icann.org <mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>>;
> Erika Randall <erika.randall at icann.org
> <mailto:erika.randall at icann.org> >; Pamela Smith
> <pamela.smith at icann.org <mailto:pamela.smith at icann.org> >; Karen
> Mulberry <karen.mulberry at icann.org <mailto:karen.mulberry at icann.org>
> >; Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org
> <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org> >
>
> Subject: Re: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review
>
> One more thought. It are some items which were recommended but were
> rejected (or more likely transformed into some other form), so I
> would add one more option to the 2nd bullet. Specifically:
>
> o Requesting the ICANN organization to do a "self-assessment"
> reporting on a) the extent to which each recommendation was followed
> and/or implemented; b) the effectiveness in addressing the issues
> identified by the First WHOIS Review Team; and c) the need for
> additional implementation.
>
> Alan
>
> At 28/10/2016 03:37 PM, Margie Milam wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> Please find attached the draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS
> Review. As I did not receive any suggested revisions, it is
> unchanged from the document circulated earlier.
>
> Safe travels & see you in India!
>
> Margie
>
> From: Margie Milam
>
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 10:03 PM
>
> To: 'chris at disspain.id.au <mailto:chris at disspain.id.au>'
> <chris at disspain.id.au <mailto:chris at disspain.id.au>>; 'Oscar A.
> Robles-Garay' <oscar at lacnic.net <mailto:oscar at lacnic.net>>; 'Thomas
> Schneider' <Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch
> <mailto:Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch>>; 'Katrina Sataki'
> <katrina at nic.lv <mailto:katrina at nic.lv>>; 'jbladel at godaddy.com
> <mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>' <jbladel at godaddy.com
> <mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>; 'louie at louie.net
> <mailto:louie at louie.net>' <louie at louie.net
> <mailto:louie at louie.net>>; 'alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
> <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>' <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
> <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> >; 'Patrik F????ltstr????m'
> <patrik at frobbit.se <mailto:patrik at frobbit.se>>; 'tsinha at umd.edu
> <mailto:tsinha at umd.edu>' <tsinha at umd.edu <mailto:tsinha at umd.edu>>;
> 'bverd at verisign.com <mailto:bverd at verisign.com>' <bverd at verisign.com
> <mailto:bverd at verisign.com>>; bruce.tonkin at melbourneit.com.au
> <mailto:bruce.tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>;
> 'cherine.chalaby at board.icann.org
> <mailto:cherine.chalaby at board.icann.org>'
> <cherine.chalaby at board.icann.org
> <mailto:cherine.chalaby at board.icann.org> >;erika at erikamann.com
> <mailto:erika at erikamann.com>; 'markus.kummer at board.icann.org
> <mailto:markus.kummer at board.icann.org>'
> <markus.kummer at board.icann.org
> <mailto:markus.kummer at board.icann.org>>;
> 'steve.crocker at board.icann.org
> <mailto:steve.crocker at board.icann.org>'
> <steve.crocker at board.icann.org
> <mailto:steve.crocker at board.icann.org>>;
> 'rinalia.abdulrahim at board.icann.org
> <mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim at board.icann.org>'
> <rinalia.abdulrahim at board.icann.org
> <mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim at board.icann.org>>; Rinalia Abdul Rahim
> (GMAIL) <rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com
> <mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com>>; Goran Marby
> <goran.marby at icann.org <mailto:goran.marby at icann.org>>; 'Chris
> Disspain' <chris at disspain.uk <mailto:chris at disspain.uk>>
>
> Cc: 'Board-Ops-Team at icann.org <mailto:Board-Ops-Team at icann.org>'
> <Board-Ops-Team at icann.org <mailto:Board-Ops-Team at icann.org> >;
> Lauren Allison <lauren.allison at icann.org
> <mailto:lauren.allison at icann.org> >; Jamie Hedlund
> <jamie.hedlund at icann.org <mailto:jamie.hedlund at icann.org> >; Cyrus
> Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org <mailto:cyrus.namazi at icann.org> >;
> David Olive <david.olive at icann.org <mailto:david.olive at icann.org>>;
> Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart at icann.org
> <mailto:theresa.swinehart at icann.org>>; Samantha Eisner
> <Samantha.Eisner at icann.org <mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>>;
> Erika Randall <erika.randall at icann.org
> <mailto:erika.randall at icann.org> >; Pamela Smith
> <pamela.smith at icann.org <mailto:pamela.smith at icann.org> >; Karen
> Mulberry <karen.mulberry at icann.org <mailto:karen.mulberry at icann.org> >
>
> Subject: RE: Request to SO/AC Leadership from Chris Disspain
>
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to provide you an update on the next steps for the
> Registration Directory Services Review (WHOIS-2), following the Oct
> 13th telephone call:
>
> ???? As discussed, Alan Greenberg and I developed the
> attached strawman proposal for a limited scope Registration
> Directory Services Review.
>
> ???? Please kindly review the attached proposal, and provide any
> initial comments by the close of business on Thursday Oct 27th, and
> a revised version will be circulated on Friday Oct 28th.
>
> ???? Any additional comments on your SO/AC????s perspective
> on this to topic can be shared at the High Interest Topic Session on
> WHOIS in Hyderabad on Sat, November 5th
>
> ???? Also, please note we plan to publish the Call for Volunteers
> for the RDS Review on Friday Oct 28th.
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Best Personal Regards,
>
> Margie
>
> _________
>
> Margie Milam
>
> Vice President-
>
> Multistakeholder Strategy &
>
> Strategic Initiatives
>
> _________
>
> Content-Type:
> application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document;
>
> name="Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v2.docx"
>
> Content-Description: Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v2.docx
>
> Content-Disposition: attachment;
>
> filename="Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v2.docx";
> size=21322;
>
> creation-date="Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:11:17 GMT";
>
> modification-date="Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:54:25 GMT"
>
> X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
>
>
> 1;DM5PR03MB2714;9:z7ZJzyqUUhIV+rYbm7ztXWmOEEIDUYAHsz5qugLtCKtYQygfhnnl7ZjXQLIS1yiJ0LlMsLOv78pLzHgtMNiID0ZtC41jLF2QHIcLuWyey8kE9RF/VT66y4CAXpAekS8UPRfQUw9mztYMiqHq/N6aKk3oqE/RccLM4DXEbPCPTvu+B63ymxG1sBnYwhZhlP/9dwWjaLPrnexlkKb2rXrrqrLkUga9rLSjKVHP8muYXEL/RIhVBL6HI9ZE9JjxS6OdSGbfaR3oW4lHBcgi40bkNrnfBZ/AgSHBe7v9Z8PRAqGOOFtlRkFkVWjfLUBKZlvOxAel/ywgTqVsAA7TdUlocnWbswVevP+4tHssI3+gAZsBXsj5OXmhCagDwnevkRtNuO7bwHbKFX4TYpD+cXltc0A2SbIXPMf97jtNZv9HO48m05uhm6QLRonkxCVMR1ue
>
>
> X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
>
> ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(20160514016)(520000050)(520002050)(750028);
>
> <Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v3-2-11-16.docx>
>
>
> Content-Type:
> application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document;
> name="Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS -
> v3-2-11-16.docx"
> Content-Description: Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS -
> v3-2-11-16.docx
> Content-Disposition: attachment;
> filename="Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS -
> v3-2-11-16.docx";
> size=21060; creation-date="Wed, 02 Nov 2016 08:12:57 GMT";
> modification-date="Wed, 02 Nov 2016 08:13:07 GMT"
> X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
>
> 1;DM5PR03MB2714;9:XkUawjzAAaJU4j1DR3X1unwaSCiumewwnDInu8vzdDiC8jqg0dUg0X9sa2HVdmRY5OT/AE2CmmnyZWG1uMqEUWhiAFW0iOPKB6XAUpvnSOe2mrgLJ8yp5KY0K+DBjA8RxtJQiJ1mZeYG/LZKh03Bunhh8CmvHFYesEGOaORs0KLmKIiA4m5//+YuJSdDAAswMFBHovg1RTPeH+qqJh5wdo8IDd5q+xQJ47/kleB1iCmv02mItqjWr2gaI7yLkheIj93sXoeeYz61fitLAis5+rVhvZjlOLEUubSqCaqabIZbAmPL8DDQcEjJon/HKKAOQSvzd65o3W3UcgPaj0AcuvErjxMNzg4KaIM6PRyNkFduCOhItAVFVqUfIwQ3mSXyKpR53o9E6pHLQDhhSB/ciwgtUzFVF5fclTf6nB7zmS/FaGQBgbECT6ATbUyF0htN
>
> X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
> ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(20160514016)(520000050)(520002050)(750028);
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list