[PC-NCSG] just checking before the new ggTLD SubPro mtg

[avri doria]

Hi,

I do not know where the NCSG is at on the topics, aand as one of the
co-chairs for the group do not wish to take on writing the NCSG
comment.  Though I will contribute to the process as an NCSG member.

One issue was brought up today in the discussion of categories for new
gTLDs.  Robin, who i think is the only NCSG member other than me
suggested we should eliminate the community category because it appeared
so arbitrary.  As a neutral co-chair I did not argue against but, but am
strongly against the idea of canceling communities as a category,
although I join others in wanting to see it less arbitrary.

On the questions asked in the CC1:

- do we support thee being more gTLDs, i assume we do

- do we support categories, like standard, [commuity], geo, brand,
closed generis, regualted and are the application categories of types of
contractual condition.

- do we support rounds or like the RySG would we like to see it evolve
toward FCFS? btw, a prediction from the RySG is that the next rounds
will include up to 10-15K application.

- what do we think about the balance of predictability vs flexibity?  I
assume we want to see a balance, but what does that mean to us.

- what about community engagement during the application process.  Most
agree it was rather helter skelter, how should it be managed in the next
procedures?

- should there be a limitation on the number of gTLDs that can be
applied for by one applicant, or during one round?   I assume we are
anti limit.


avri

On 08-Aug-16 12:33, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> Hi Avri,
>
> My guess is that we have our attention focused on other issues. As you
> know, often the members of the NCSG who are in the WG prepare a draft
> of the comments on issues they think are of concern or interest to the
> SG.
>
> With so many issues involved with the New gTLD Overarching issues, on
> what issues do you think we should be commenting?
>
> Best, Kathy
>
>
> On 8/8/2016 11:27 AM, avri doria wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The extended deadline for the comments on the Community Comments 1 on
>> New gTLD overarching issues was Friday.
>>
>> I assume we did not submit anything.  Do we plan to, or should I just
>> indicate NCSG passes on having an opinion on any of these issues?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus