[PC-NCSG] draft UDRP/RPM Comments

[Kathy Kleiman]

Hi Sam,
Tx for your close review - much, much appreciated!!  I've incorporated 
your edits. Correcting the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights 
(good catch) and updating the Redskins trademark to take away "powerful 
and very," but keeping "valuable" to illustrate the idea that even the 
valuable trademarks can be lost.

I've also incorporated Stephanie's edits (with thanks to Stephanie!). 
Version 5 attached.

Whoever takes this to final, could you please: convert the final to PDF 
and add the appropriate signature section?
Best and tx,
Kathy

On 11/29/2015 11:58 AM, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
> Thanks to Kathy and Stephanie for the work on the Draft Comments of 
> NCSG to Preliminary Issue Report on a Policy  Development Process to 
> Review All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All Generic Top-Level Domains.
>
> I have appended the document as version 4, aa it was in version 3, 
> with to added two comments/suggestions.
>
> The first is to drop the explicit reference to the UDHR (p 4.1), but 
> if kept correct it to properly read Universal Declaration of Human 
> Rights, (not United Nations Declaration of Human Rights). Simply 
> adding "freedom of expression" is adequate here.
>
> The second is with regard to the "Redskins" trade mark decision (p. 
> 2.8) where I would drop "powerful and very valuable" as irrelevant 
> [unless one is a US football team owner or football fanatic (-: ]
>
> Sam L.
>
>
>
> On 29/11/2015 9:09 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>> Stephanie's edits are great. They are still highlighted in the attached
>> document. If you could review these comments today, we would appreciate
>> it - and get them ready to submit tomorrow.
>> Sorry for the delay, but PPSAI has been busy too!
>> Best,
>> Kathy
>>
>> On 11/28/2015 8:50 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>> As requested, I have given this excellent document a light edit in
>>> markup.  This is certainly not my area of expertise, but it strikes me
>>> as extremely important.  I invite those with greater knowledge than I
>>> of UDRP matters to have a look at this document, make sure I did not
>>> alter the meaning as I sought to correct typos etc, and see if more
>>> should be added.  I think Kathy has definitely given them something to
>>> chew on here, though, it looks excellent to me.  We must make sure we
>>> get it in on time (deadline Monday). I am adding Monika to the cc as I
>>> know that she has done work on the UDRP, as well as Wendy and Robin
>>> since I am not sure they are on the NCSG-policy list.  The link for
>>> the report is here:
>>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rpm-prelim-issue-2015-10-09-en
>>> kind regards
>>> Stephanie Perrin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: UDRP Review comments 5.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 54272 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20151129/af9ab5bc/attachment-0001.doc>