[PC-NCSG] draft UDRP/RPM Comments - Version 6
Sam Lanfranco
lanfran
Mon Nov 30 00:38:41 EET 2015
Kathy,
Could do the PDF but cannot since I don't know what the "appropriate
signature section" is...within the PDF.
I cleaned up two things, removing the redundant (b & (c in the first
paragraph, and deleting the remaining comments by Stephanie, since the
text accepts the replacement of "light years" with "centuries".
As I understand it, Stephanie's comment with regard to the time period
(p.5) "Should the STI consensus be reversed to allow Trademark claims
period to be extended beyond ninety days?"
is with regard to NCSG questioning the following language in the Staff
Paper on Rights Protection Mechanisms in the New gTLD Program: Revised
Report September 2015
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rpm-prelim-issue-2015-10-09-en
(5.3 Extensions of Trademark Claims Service, page 84). Or is it
something more?
"The Trademark Clearinghouse also offers an Ongoing Notifications
service at no additional cost that informs the trademark holder whenever
someone has activated a domain name in a new gTLD that matches a term
that is recorded in the Trademark Clearinghouse. When opting in to this
service, the trademark holder will receive a notice informing them of
the matching domain name, so the trademark holder can determine whether
it wishes to take action. This is a non-mandatory service provided
following the 90-day Claims Period for each new gTLD whereby trademark
holders are notified of potential intellectual property infringement for
an indefinite period of time beyond the required 90-day period. Deloitte
provides this service to trademark holders and agents for the duration
of their trademark record registration into the Trademark"
Sam L.
On 29/11/2015 1:41 PM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> Hi Sam,
> Tx for your close review - much, much appreciated!! I've incorporated
> your edits. Correcting the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights
> (good catch) and updating the Redskins trademark to take away "powerful
> and very," but keeping "valuable" to illustrate the idea that even the
> valuable trademarks can be lost.
>
> I've also incorporated Stephanie's edits (with thanks to Stephanie!).
> Version 5 attached.
>
> Whoever takes this to final, could you please: convert the final to PDF
> and add the appropriate signature section?
> Best and tx,
> Kathy
>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list