[PC-NCSG] Final call for NCSG on IANA stewardship transition draft proposal

[Rafik Dammak]

Thanks Amr and Sam for your responses.
We made it!
Time to start with CCWG comment too.

Best,

Rafik

2015-05-21 2:02 GMT+09:00 Sam Lanfranco <lanfran at yorku.ca>:

>  All,
>
> I have read the final draft of the NCSG submission and am personally happy
> with it. I expect to shortly be able to post a formal endorsement from NPOC
> as well.
> *A minor-trivial typo is the sense error -commonly made- in the initial
> comments where: * Legal and structural separation are key. should be Legal
> and structural separation is key.
>
> Sam
> On 20/05/2015 11:38 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I still haven?t had the chance to go through the CWG proposal as thoroughly as I would have liked to (apologies, but have had a lot on my plate recently). I have gone through it all once, and from what I?ve gathered both from reading it, and from the discussion we?ve had on yesterday?s NCSG monthly policy call, I?m fine with the NCSG statement.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150521/13b93c3a/attachment.html>