[PC-NCSG] .CAT, .PRO, public comment endorsement request

[Amr Elsadr]

That was my understanding as well.

Thanks.

Amr

On Jul 5, 2015, at 10:30 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> wrote:

> Hi Ed,
> 
> thanks for the work. I think there was already an agreement in BA meeting to submit the adapted comments for .cat and .pro , which are  similar to .travel comment. if there is no objections by Monday, I would assume that the comments are endorsed by NCSG PC and I will submit them by the deadline.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rafik
> 
> 2015-07-05 23:14 GMT+09:00 Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net>:
> HI everybody,
> 
> 
> The deadline for submission of public comments on the .cat and .pro renewal agreements is this Tuesday, two days from now. I've looked over both agreements and they are virtually identical to the .travel agreement.
> 
> Attached please find two draft public comments for which I ask the endorsement of the PC. They are identical to that which we submitted on 21 June ( http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-travel-renewal-12may15/msg00013.html) with the exception of changed dates and, of course, changed TLD names. 
> 
> Although repetitive I do believe we should take the opportunity to respond to each instance of staff's blatant attempt to bypass the PDP process by creating de facto consensus policy through contract. This is simply unacceptable.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Ed
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg