[PC-NCSG] [Gnso-ncph-leadership] NCPH v-chair election - just what we all have time for

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi,

That's what I figured as well. Not sure how the rejection vote makes a difference, which is why I am not opposed to the suggested change by the CSG. 

Thanks. 

Amr

Sent from mobile

> On Aug 6, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Sam Lanfranco <lanfran at yorku.ca> wrote:
> 
> Avri,
> 
> I agree with rejecting the "totally unacceptable" but I don't see how a vote on preferences
> would fail to boot that candidate off the list. The top of the "don't like" vote should be the
> bottom of the "like vote", or am I missing something other than a chance to whack a bad
> candidate before going on to select a good one.
> 
> Sam
> 
>> On 06/08/2015 7:09 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I think the amendment is unfortunate as id does not really consider the
>> proposal that was offered and the advantage of everyone first voicing
>> the candidate that would be totally unacceptable - the elephant that is
>> always in the room with us.
>> 
>> But since we operate by rough consensus, my opposition should not be
>> significant.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>> 
>>> On 06-Aug-15 04:25, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> so I can assume that we are ok with small amendment proposed by CSG?
>>> looking to hear from other so I can respond to Steve.
>>> 
>>> Rafik
>>> 
>>> 2015-07-26 6:10 GMT+09:00 Joy Liddicoat <joy at liddicoatlaw.co.nz
>>> <mailto:joy at liddicoatlaw.co.nz>>: