[PC-NCSG] resending the GNSO documents

[Edward Morris]

Hi Stephanie,
  
 I'd first like to thank Klaus for the work he did on his personal comment on this matter. First rate and I agree with most of it. Thanks for doing it.
  
 I'm happy to endorse this document, Steph, despite my misgivings about taking anything Westlake does seriously. The only minor point is that the NCSG did not previously, to the best of my knowledge, submit comments on the first draft. That was done by the constituencies.
  
 Thanks for all of your work on this Stephanie.
  
 Ed
  
  
  
  
  

----------------------------------------
 From: "Stephanie Perrin" <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 9:48 PM
To: pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org
Subject: Re: [PC-NCSG] resending the GNSO documents   
Fair enough, can we gather a list of folks who will sign on? 
SP
  On 2015-07-31 14:51, Klaus Stoll wrote:
 Dear Stephanie and Friends

I understand and appreciate all the hard work that has been done on this document. However, I feel that I can not agree on that this document is send as the position of the whole NCSG. It simply has not been discussed broadly enough and just the members of the PC is not enough for such an important letter.

I have no objection that the letter is forwarded with signatures on a personal basis.

Yours

Klaus

  On 7/31/2015 1:03 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
 New version of the 2 pager folks, I have incorporated James' edits and added a mini paragraph acknowledging that the first 19 recommendations do attempt to deal with worker burnout ...
Many thanks for the rapid turnaround James!!
cheers SP

On 2015-07-31 12:51, Stephanie Perrin wrote: Let us say that at UTC 23:00 I will send them in as personal comments, if we have not achieved concensus on them yet.  That is about 6 hours from now folks, achieving consensus is doable if folks try....
cheers Steph

On 2015-07-31 11:34, Amr Elsadr wrote: Thanks Stephanie. I'm going through these now. May I ask other members of the PC to also go through the documents Stephanie has provided, and give feedback and indicate whether or not they support these as NCSG submissions?

Thanks again.

Amr
  On Jul 31, 2015, at 4:32 PM, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

Apparently some did not receive this yesterday, my apologies. They were sent at 17:33 and 23:18 yesterday.
Steph

<NCSG Comments on the 2015 GNSO Review.docx><gnso-review-draft-input-template-02jun15-en.docx>_______________________________________________
PC-NCSG mailing list
PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg  

_______________________________________________
PC-NCSG mailing list
PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg         

 _______________________________________________ PC-NCSG mailing list PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg           

 _______________________________________________ PC-NCSG mailing list PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg   
 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150731/bbea0788/attachment.html>