[PC-NCSG] resending the GNSO documents

[Edward Morris]

Stephanie,

Too much going on as the IPC tries at the last minute to change terms of the human rights bylaws addition before the document freeze tonight. Could you please point me to the document involved? As usual, I'm having trouble with Google Docs tonight so if it is somewhere other than there I would appreciate a link, reference, attachment etc.

Thanks for all your hard work on this. I only wish there were 36 hours on a day so I could help more.

Ed

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 31, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
> 
> Fair enough, can we gather a list of folks who will sign on?  
> SP
> 
>> On 2015-07-31 14:51, Klaus Stoll wrote:
>> Dear Stephanie and Friends
>> 
>> I understand and appreciate all the hard work that has been done on this document. However, I feel that I can not agree on that this document is send as the position of the whole NCSG. It simply has not been discussed broadly enough and just the members of the PC is not enough for such an important letter.
>> 
>> I have no objection that the letter is forwarded with signatures on a personal basis.
>> 
>> Yours
>> 
>> Klaus 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 7/31/2015 1:03 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>> New version of the 2 pager folks, I have incorporated James' edits and added a mini paragraph acknowledging that the first 19 recommendations do attempt to deal with worker burnout ... 
>>> Many thanks for the rapid turnaround James!! 
>>> cheers SP 
>>> 
>>>> On 2015-07-31 12:51, Stephanie Perrin wrote: 
>>>> Let us say that at UTC 23:00 I will send them in as personal comments, if we have not achieved concensus on them yet.  That is about 6 hours from now folks, achieving consensus is doable if folks try.... 
>>>> cheers Steph 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2015-07-31 11:34, Amr Elsadr wrote: 
>>>>> Thanks Stephanie. I?m going through these now. May I ask other members of the PC to also go through the documents Stephanie has provided, and give feedback and indicate whether or not they support these as NCSG submissions? 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks again. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Amr 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2015, at 4:32 PM, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote: 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Apparently some did not receive this yesterday, my apologies. They were sent at 17:33 and 23:18 yesterday. 
>>>>>> Steph 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <NCSG Comments on the 2015 GNSO Review.docx><gnso-review-draft-input-template-02jun15-en.docx>_______________________________________________
>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list 
>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org 
>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list 
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org 
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150731/a2519bd1/attachment-0001.html>