[PC-NCSG] resending the GNSO documents

[Stephanie Perrin]

Thank Ed, good catch.  Since NCUC and I both sent comments on the 
methodology, and we are only doing this now as me with signatories, I 
shall refer to them both.
cheers SP
On 2015-07-31 18:11, Edward Morris wrote:
> Hi Stephanie,
> I'd first like to thank Klaus for the work he did on his personal 
> comment on this matter. First rate and I agree with most of it. Thanks 
> for doing it.
> I'm happy to endorse this document, Steph, despite my misgivings about 
> taking anything Westlake does seriously. The only minor point is that 
> the NCSG did not previously, to the best of my knowledge, submit 
> comments on the first draft. That was done by the constituencies.
> Thanks for all of your work on this Stephanie.
> Ed
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From*: "Stephanie Perrin" <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
> *Sent*: Friday, July 31, 2015 9:48 PM
> *To*: pc-ncsg at ipjustice.org
> *Subject*: Re: [PC-NCSG] resending the GNSO documents
> Fair enough, can we gather a list of folks who will sign on?
> SP
> On 2015-07-31 14:51, Klaus Stoll wrote:
>> Dear Stephanie and Friends
>>
>> I understand and appreciate all the hard work that has been done on 
>> this document. However, I feel that I can not agree on that this 
>> document is send as the position of the whole NCSG. It simply has not 
>> been discussed broadly enough and just the members of the PC is not 
>> enough for such an important letter.
>>
>> I have no objection that the letter is forwarded with signatures on a 
>> personal basis.
>>
>> Yours
>>
>> Klaus
>>
>>
>> On 7/31/2015 1:03 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>> New version of the 2 pager folks, I have incorporated James' edits 
>>> and added a mini paragraph acknowledging that the first 19 
>>> recommendations do attempt to deal with worker burnout ...
>>> Many thanks for the rapid turnaround James!!
>>> cheers SP
>>>
>>> On 2015-07-31 12:51, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>>> Let us say that at UTC 23:00 I will send them in as personal 
>>>> comments, if we have not achieved concensus on them yet.  That is 
>>>> about 6 hours from now folks, achieving consensus is doable if 
>>>> folks try....
>>>> cheers Steph
>>>>
>>>> On 2015-07-31 11:34, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>>>>> Thanks Stephanie. I?m going through these now. May I ask other 
>>>>> members of the PC to also go through the documents Stephanie has 
>>>>> provided, and give feedback and indicate whether or not they 
>>>>> support these as NCSG submissions?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Amr
>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2015, at 4:32 PM, Stephanie Perrin 
>>>>>> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apparently some did not receive this yesterday, my apologies. 
>>>>>> They were sent at 17:33 and 23:18 yesterday.
>>>>>> Steph
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <NCSG Comments on the 2015 GNSO 
>>>>>> Review.docx><gnso-review-draft-input-template-02jun15-en.docx>_______________________________________________
>>>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20150731/4ab9b7e0/attachment-0001.html>