[PC-NCSG] starting process of appointment to Accountabilit and Governance co-ordination group

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi,

The process Avri suggested sounds good to me. We haven?t had a call for nominations on the NCSG list for this yet, have we?

Thanks.

Amr

On Sep 17, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> till now we got a proposal from process from Avri, any comment , amendments or objections with that? we need really to move more quickly and getting responses from other PC members. we need to have the process, getting nominees and make selection.
> 
> I am thinking that maybe NCSG PC need to have its own monthly confcall if it can help to handle stuff in more timely manner.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rafik 
> 
> 2014-09-13 12:13 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:
> Hi Avri,
> 
> yes I am talking about b. 
> 
> Rafik
> 
> 
> 2014-09-13 1:27 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:
> Hi,
> 
> I think we are talking about tow things.
> 
> a. we should be suggesting experts if we know of experts who we think
> would be good as experts.
> 
> b. there is one seat for an NCSG representative on the AGC (assumming
> there still is an ACG after we finshed the review)
> 
> I thought Rafik was talking about b.
> This is a case where the PC picks one person.
> 
> Any nominees yet?
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> On 12-Sep-14 12:08, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
> > An alternative process with rationale:
> >
> > The four people of the Public Experts Group will be responsible for the
> > selection of up to seven advisors to the Coordination Group from the
> > list of candidates. They seek regional representation and there is a
> > long list of areas they would like to cover with advisor expertise. It
> > is impossible to assess the range of expertise and geographic
> > representation that will come with other candidates. NCSG selecting one
> > or two candidates is probably not the best strategy.
> >
> > In order to maximize the chances of NCSG candidates being selected, I
> > (with NPOC excom support) would like to propose that we simply forward a
> > slate of names with regional representation and let the Public Experts
> > mix-and-match to achieve a well representative and balanced set of
> > advisors.
> >
> > Sam L., Chair,
> > NPOC Policy Committee
> >
> >
> > On 12/09/2014 11:06 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> any other proposal for this process? we are late and we should make
> >> some progress.
> >>
> >> Rafik
> >>
> >> 2014-08-31 14:35 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
> >> <mailto:avri at acm.org>>:
> >>
> >>     Hi,
> >>
> >>     How about call for nominations on the discussion list
> >>     - with a requirements that they have signed up for the community
> >> group
> >>
> >>     And then the PC picks - with any PC members who may have been
> >>     nominated
> >>     abstaining from the process.
> >>
> >>     avri
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140917/ff6da1ea/attachment.html>