[PC-NCSG] starting process of appointment to Accountabilit and Governance co-ordination group
Stephanie Perrin
stephanie.perrin
Wed Sep 17 14:53:06 EEST 2014
I agree
On 2014-09-17, 3:42, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> till now we got a proposal from process from Avri, any comment ,
> amendments or objections with that? we need really to move more
> quickly and getting responses from other PC members. we need to have
> the process, getting nominees and make selection.
>
> I am thinking that maybe NCSG PC need to have its own monthly confcall
> if it can help to handle stuff in more timely manner.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2014-09-13 12:13 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:
>
> Hi Avri,
>
> yes I am talking about b.
>
> Rafik
>
>
> 2014-09-13 1:27 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
> <mailto:avri at acm.org>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think we are talking about tow things.
>
> a. we should be suggesting experts if we know of experts who
> we think
> would be good as experts.
>
> b. there is one seat for an NCSG representative on the AGC
> (assumming
> there still is an ACG after we finshed the review)
>
> I thought Rafik was talking about b.
> This is a case where the PC picks one person.
>
> Any nominees yet?
>
> avri
>
>
> On 12-Sep-14 12:08, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
> > An alternative process with rationale:
> >
> > The four people of the Public Experts Group will be
> responsible for the
> > selection of up to seven advisors to the Coordination Group
> from the
> > list of candidates. They seek regional representation and
> there is a
> > long list of areas they would like to cover with advisor
> expertise. It
> > is impossible to assess the range of expertise and geographic
> > representation that will come with other candidates. NCSG
> selecting one
> > or two candidates is probably not the best strategy.
> >
> > In order to maximize the chances of NCSG candidates being
> selected, I
> > (with NPOC excom support) would like to propose that we
> simply forward a
> > slate of names with regional representation and let the
> Public Experts
> > mix-and-match to achieve a well representative and balanced
> set of
> > advisors.
> >
> > Sam L., Chair,
> > NPOC Policy Committee
> >
> >
> > On 12/09/2014 11:06 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> any other proposal for this process? we are late and we
> should make
> >> some progress.
> >>
> >> Rafik
> >>
> >> 2014-08-31 14:35 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
> <mailto:avri at acm.org>
> >> <mailto:avri at acm.org <mailto:avri at acm.org>>>:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> How about call for nominations on the discussion list
> >> - with a requirements that they have signed up for the
> community
> >> group
> >>
> >> And then the PC picks - with any PC members who may
> have been
> >> nominated
> >> abstaining from the process.
> >>
> >> avri
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-NCSG mailing list
> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140917/62aa178f/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list