[PC-NCSG] starting process of appointment to Accountabilit and Governance co-ordination group

[Stephanie Perrin]

I agree
On 2014-09-17, 3:42, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> till now we got a proposal from process from Avri, any comment , 
> amendments or objections with that? we need really to move more 
> quickly and getting responses from other PC members. we need to have 
> the process, getting nominees and make selection.
>
> I am thinking that maybe NCSG PC need to have its own monthly confcall 
> if it can help to handle stuff in more timely manner.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2014-09-13 12:13 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com 
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hi Avri,
>
>     yes I am talking about b.
>
>     Rafik
>
>
>     2014-09-13 1:27 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>     <mailto:avri at acm.org>>:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         I think we are talking about tow things.
>
>         a. we should be suggesting experts if we know of experts who
>         we think
>         would be good as experts.
>
>         b. there is one seat for an NCSG representative on the AGC
>         (assumming
>         there still is an ACG after we finshed the review)
>
>         I thought Rafik was talking about b.
>         This is a case where the PC picks one person.
>
>         Any nominees yet?
>
>         avri
>
>
>         On 12-Sep-14 12:08, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
>         > An alternative process with rationale:
>         >
>         > The four people of the Public Experts Group will be
>         responsible for the
>         > selection of up to seven advisors to the Coordination Group
>         from the
>         > list of candidates. They seek regional representation and
>         there is a
>         > long list of areas they would like to cover with advisor
>         expertise. It
>         > is impossible to assess the range of expertise and geographic
>         > representation that will come with other candidates. NCSG
>         selecting one
>         > or two candidates is probably not the best strategy.
>         >
>         > In order to maximize the chances of NCSG candidates being
>         selected, I
>         > (with NPOC excom support) would like to propose that we
>         simply forward a
>         > slate of names with regional representation and let the
>         Public Experts
>         > mix-and-match to achieve a well representative and balanced
>         set of
>         > advisors.
>         >
>         > Sam L., Chair,
>         > NPOC Policy Committee
>         >
>         >
>         > On 12/09/2014 11:06 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>         >> Hi,
>         >>
>         >> any other proposal for this process? we are late and we
>         should make
>         >> some progress.
>         >>
>         >> Rafik
>         >>
>         >> 2014-08-31 14:35 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>         <mailto:avri at acm.org>
>         >> <mailto:avri at acm.org <mailto:avri at acm.org>>>:
>         >>
>         >>     Hi,
>         >>
>         >>     How about call for nominations on the discussion list
>         >>     - with a requirements that they have signed up for the
>         community
>         >> group
>         >>
>         >>     And then the PC picks - with any PC members who may
>         have been
>         >>     nominated
>         >>     abstaining from the process.
>         >>
>         >>     avri
>         >>
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > PC-NCSG mailing list
>         > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>         > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>         >
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         PC-NCSG mailing list
>         PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org <mailto:PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>
>         http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-NCSG mailing list
> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140917/62aa178f/attachment-0001.html>