[PC-NCSG] starting process of appointment to Accountabilit and Governance co-ordination group

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi everyone,

till now we got a proposal from process from Avri, any comment , amendments
or objections with that? we need really to move more quickly and getting
responses from other PC members. we need to have the process, getting
nominees and make selection.

I am thinking that maybe NCSG PC need to have its own monthly confcall if
it can help to handle stuff in more timely manner.

Best,

Rafik

2014-09-13 12:13 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:

> Hi Avri,
>
> yes I am talking about b.
>
> Rafik
>
>
> 2014-09-13 1:27 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think we are talking about tow things.
>>
>> a. we should be suggesting experts if we know of experts who we think
>> would be good as experts.
>>
>> b. there is one seat for an NCSG representative on the AGC (assumming
>> there still is an ACG after we finshed the review)
>>
>> I thought Rafik was talking about b.
>> This is a case where the PC picks one person.
>>
>> Any nominees yet?
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> On 12-Sep-14 12:08, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
>> > An alternative process with rationale:
>> >
>> > The four people of the Public Experts Group will be responsible for the
>> > selection of up to seven advisors to the Coordination Group from the
>> > list of candidates. They seek regional representation and there is a
>> > long list of areas they would like to cover with advisor expertise. It
>> > is impossible to assess the range of expertise and geographic
>> > representation that will come with other candidates. NCSG selecting one
>> > or two candidates is probably not the best strategy.
>> >
>> > In order to maximize the chances of NCSG candidates being selected, I
>> > (with NPOC excom support) would like to propose that we simply forward a
>> > slate of names with regional representation and let the Public Experts
>> > mix-and-match to achieve a well representative and balanced set of
>> > advisors.
>> >
>> > Sam L., Chair,
>> > NPOC Policy Committee
>> >
>> >
>> > On 12/09/2014 11:06 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> any other proposal for this process? we are late and we should make
>> >> some progress.
>> >>
>> >> Rafik
>> >>
>> >> 2014-08-31 14:35 GMT+09:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>> >> <mailto:avri at acm.org>>:
>> >>
>> >>     Hi,
>> >>
>> >>     How about call for nominations on the discussion list
>> >>     - with a requirements that they have signed up for the community
>> >> group
>> >>
>> >>     And then the PC picks - with any PC members who may have been
>> >>     nominated
>> >>     abstaining from the process.
>> >>
>> >>     avri
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > PC-NCSG mailing list
>> > PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> > http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-NCSG mailing list
>> PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
>> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/pc-ncsg
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/attachments/20140917/9d9b37b8/attachment.html>