[NCSG-EC] Fwd: NCSG membership applications

[Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele]

I can't make an informed opinion now.

However, i'd be happy to have an admin account to first look at what we
have.

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 1:20 PM Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC <
ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:

> Thanks David! We have two kind of separate issues here - one is the
> longer term way forward, and the other is the immediate need to
> deal with the current embarrassing backlog.
>
>         Julf
>
>
> On 22/11/2022 17:58, David Morar wrote:
> > I am torn on this. I think having the system is useful, but if it's
> > crummy, maybe we're better off without it?
> > I am the least technical person in our group, I think, so it's entirely
> > up to you all.
> >
> > Thank you very much,
> > Have a great week,
> > David
> >
> > David Morar, PhD
> > @morar <https://twitter.com/morar>
> > davidmorar.com <http://davidmorar.com/>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:52 AM Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC
> > <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>> wrote:
> >
> >     No opinions?
> >
> >              Julf
> >
> >
> >
> >     -------- Forwarded Message --------
> >     Subject: [NCSG-EC] NCSG membership applications
> >     Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:51:08 +0100
> >     From: Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is
> >     <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>>
> >     Reply-To: Johan Helsingius <julf at Julf.com>
> >     To: NCSG EC <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>>
> >
> >     Dear EC,
> >
> >     Tapani volunteered to look into CiviCRM, and has given me an
> >     admin account too. With his help, I managed to dump the data
> >     as a CSV file, and wrote a simple (n)awk script to format it
> >     in a more readable form. The results are attached, in both Word
> >     and ASCII text form.
> >
> >     Many of the applications seem to lack the domain name information,
> >     but for individual users that is not a show stopper.
> >
> >     How do you want to proceed? We could use CiviCRM/terminal to
> >     gather your (revised) views, but unfortunately it only allows
> >     for "Yes" or "No", not "Maybe, if they can provide <whatever>",
> >     or we could just email our opinions as a list of applications
> >     we don't approve (and why). What do you think is easier?
> >
> >     As to CiviCRM, my impression of it, as a former software
> >     developer, is that it would perform well as a vacuum cleaner.
> >     Seems the vendor would need exact specifications for any changes
> >     we need even to provide a cost estimate. It also seems the
> >     software actually has to be updated any time the EC changes...
> >
> >              Julf
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     NCSG-EC mailing list
> >     NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is>
> >     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
> >     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-EC mailing list
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>


-- 
*Caleb Ogundele*
Mobile: +1-204-558-6904
Email: muyiwacaleb at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20221122/f8196471/attachment.htm>