[NCSG-EC] clarifications on election

Stephanie E Perrin stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
Tue Jun 2 16:23:26 EEST 2020


I am sorry not to have responded, and thanks for jumping in!

SP

On 2020-06-01 11:44 p.m., Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix wrote:
> Have you made arrangements re chairing the meeting? Do you want/Is one 
> of us to take care of it, or is it Maryam that usually does in those 
> cases?
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 11:21 PM U Of T 
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca 
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>
>     Incidently, i unfortunately will not be able to attend the meeting
>     tomorrow as i have a client conference that was booked months
>     ago.  I will keep an eye on skype, and if there is an emergency,
>     please send me a ping and i will break away.
>     Very sorry but this was unexpected.  So was the stupid EPDP
>     meeting also on tomorrow.
>     Someone may wish to point out to these folks that my announcements
>     if the election contained links to the relevant chunk of the
>     Charter.   Good idea to read the message.
>     Cheers Steph
>
>     Sent from my iPhone
>
>>     On Jun 1, 2020, at 20:48, U Of T
>>     <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>>     <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>>
>>     I think those are great responses.  Are you going to ignore the
>>     transgender bit?
>>
>>     Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>>     On Jun 1, 2020, at 20:26, Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix via NCSG-EC
>>>     <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     
>>>     Thanks for jumping in Robin, and thank you for the info!
>>>
>>>     On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 6:15 PM Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org
>>>     <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Raphael,
>>>
>>>         Thanks for drafting this below.  It is a NCSG rule that we
>>>         have followed since the charter’s initial adoption in 2011. 
>>>         A few years ago, we were worried we wouldn’t have enough
>>>         male candidates to meet the requirement.  This year, we
>>>         almost lacked enough female candidates, but thanks to
>>>         Stephanie we can meet our charter requirement.
>>>
>>>         Best,
>>>         Robin
>>>
>>>>         On Jun 1, 2020, at 3:06 PM, Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix
>>>>         <rbeauregardlacroix at GMAIL.COM
>>>>         <mailto:rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>         I'm afraid some "dissent" might catch on and snowball. I'm
>>>>         not totally convinced of the wisdom of replying at this
>>>>         point though, so open to any suggestion.
>>>>
>>>>         But what I could foresee in terms of language:
>>>>
>>>>         "Dear +++,
>>>>
>>>>         The basis for the rules we follow regarding elections to
>>>>         the GNSO can be found in Art. 3.1. of the Charter. We have
>>>>         been using this system since +++. You may disagree with it;
>>>>         there is indeed some rigidity to it. You are also free to
>>>>         voice your disagreement.
>>>>
>>>>         While elections are often a time where procedural debates
>>>>         arise, we would however encourage discussions about changes
>>>>         to our electoral system for the GNSO Council positions to
>>>>         take place outside the electoral period. The reason for
>>>>         this is that a change to this electoral process would
>>>>         require a Charter amendment, in line with the rules at Art.
>>>>         5 of said Charter.
>>>>
>>>>         You can find the most recent version of the Charter here:
>>>>         https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/filefield_25801/ncsg-charter-05may11-en.pdf
>>>>
>>>>         Thank you for your understanding and continued engagement,"
>>>>
>>>>         On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 1:51 PM Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix
>>>>         <rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com
>>>>         <mailto:rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             Yes sounds all good, and thanks a lot for volunteering
>>>>             language :)
>>>>
>>>>             On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 1:21 PM Robin Gross via NCSG-EC
>>>>             <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>>
>>>>             wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 EC Members:
>>>>
>>>>                 I’d like to send the following message to the
>>>>                 discuss list to help set expectations regarding
>>>>                 this election.  Please let me know if you object
>>>>                 before 12:00 PT today because I will send it then
>>>>                 in keeping with our election timetable.  Thanks for
>>>>                 your quick response!
>>>>
>>>>                 Best,
>>>>                 Robin
>>>>                 ==========
>>>>
>>>>                 NCSG Members:
>>>>
>>>>                 I want to clarify a few issues in advance regarding
>>>>                 the current NCSG election.
>>>>
>>>>                 1.  We have 4 GNSO Council seats up for election. 
>>>>                 The top 3 vote getters will receive a two-year
>>>>                 term. The 4th place vote getter will only be for a
>>>>                 one-year term because it is filling a seat
>>>>                 mid-term.  This is subject to paragraph 2 below.
>>>>
>>>>                 2.  Regarding the gender diversity rule for the
>>>>                 GNSO Council, the NCSG Charter provides that “in no
>>>>                 circumstance should there be fewer than two members
>>>>                 of any gender.”  As Tatiana is presently our only
>>>>                 continuing female member, Stephanie will
>>>>                 automatically be elected to the GNSO Council
>>>>                 regardless of how many votes she receives because
>>>>                 we are required to have at least two female Council
>>>>                 members under our charter.  So the gender rule,
>>>>                 trumps the number of votes earned in terms of
>>>>                 winning a seat.  This means that Stephanie + the
>>>>                 top 3 vote getters from the other candidates will
>>>>                 be elected to Council.
>>>>
>>>>                 3.  Our regional diversity rules should not be a
>>>>                 factor in this election, however, because no more
>>>>                 than two members would be declared resident of the
>>>>                 same geographic region.
>>>>                 _______________________________________________
>>>>                 NCSG-EC mailing list
>>>>                 NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>>                 https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     NCSG-EC mailing list
>>>     NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20200602/6147d22c/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-EC mailing list