[NCSG-EC] Evaluation of individual applicants

Wed Feb 20 06:20:42 EET 2019

Hi Juan

You are right, as this feature was related to the previous form and has yet
to be implemented with the new form.

That being said, there is the more overarching question of how long we will
keep that current atrocious front end. Farzaneh and I are in touch with
them. They are the kind of provider which, unfortunately, will not do much
without close supervision and follow-ups.

I will update the EC as the work on that front progresses.

Talk to you soon,

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:00 PM Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi at yahoo.com>
wrote:

> Dear all,
> I have checked and for me the Systems works also fine. The only thing that
> I noted it was that now we cannot see from the table if there is missing
> evaluations or not. I mean, before we could read the names of EC members
> that already had voted, but now it doesn't show it anymore.
>
>
> JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P.
> Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia
> Membership Committee Chair. Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns
> Constituency (NPOC) - ICANN
> Cluster Orinoco TIC member
> Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes
>
> Cel. +57 3017435600
> Twitter: @JmanuRojas <http://www.twitter.com/jmanurojas>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> El martes, 19 de febrero de 2019 11:57:09 a. m. GMT-5, Raphaël
> Beauregard-Lacroix via NCSG-EC <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escribió:
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> Friendly reminder re the evaluation of applications :)
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 4:21 PM Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix <
> rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok thanks for the clarification :)
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 4:20 PM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Rapahel,
>
>  We have not had a case where constituencies run their own approval
> process to accept a member that has already been approved at NCSG level.
> They usually just inform their EC that these are the new members and
> announce on the mailing list. However, the NPOC and NCUC ECs have the right
> to do so (for example it is already in NCUC bylaws).
>
> My impression is that, if a constituency does not accept a member, then
> the member will remain an unaffiliated NCSG member. The provision is to
> preserve constituencies independence and allow for NCSG to be independent
> too. And again my interpretation is that NCSG EC officers should act
> independent of their constituencies, i.e. advance the interest of NCSG at
> the GNSO level and represent NCSG in their constituencies if they are
> affiliated with any, (while of course at the same time carry out their
> duties and report to their constituencies).
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 3:59 PM Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix <
> rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Farzaneh.
>
> I have done the individuals already and will do the orgs this weekend.
>
> Good to know re the procedure.
>
> I was not aware re NCUC/NPOC's own procedure. How does that reflect on
> what we need to do once we all (the EC) agree that an applicant should
> become a member?
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 3:34 PM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Thanks Raphael for this. the NCSG Organization applicants have also been
> fixed.
> Please login and let us know how it is working for you.
>
> Just wanted to draw your attention to the lightweight procedure we drafted
> for approval of member (it's in Q and A format) the most important part is:
>
>
>    - When the Executive Committee approves your application, you will
>    receive a welcome email, and you will be subscribed to our main mailing
>    list, and will be a member of NCSG. After your NCSG membership has been
>    approved, those constituencies you indicated you want to join, if any, will
>    be notified. Constituencies have their own processes for accepting your
>    application after your NCSG membership application has been approved.
>    - If the Executive Committee does not find you eligible for
>    membership, you will be sent an email with the reason explaining why your
>    application has been unsuccessful. Your personal information, other than
>    your name (or/ and organization name, if applicable) and the reason for
>    rejection, will be deleted from our database. The EC will also keep a
>    record of its communication with you which might have the email address you
>    provided in your application.
>    - If the Executive Committee cannot verify your non-commercial
>    interest in DNS policy or if the website you have pointed us to does not
>    resolve , or for other reasons that the Executive Committee deems
>    appropriate based on the charter and these guidelines and your application,
>    you will be sent an email requesting clarification before a formal decision
>    is made. If we did not receive any response within one month of our
>    inquiry, your application will be withdrawn, but you will be welcome to
>    re-apply for membership again in the future. In such circumstances, the
>    Executive Committee will delete your personal data from our membership
>    database other than your name (and organization name, if applicable) and
>    the reason for rejection. The EC will also keep a record of its
>    communication with you which might have the email address you provided in
>    your application.
>
>
>
> Here is the link:
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Operating+Procedures#OperatingProcedures-390467708
> Farzaneh
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:48 PM Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix via NCSG-EC <
> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> It is now possible to proceed with the evaluation of individual applicants
> from the front end members.ncsg.is
>
> UI-wise, it is still as clunky, but it does work on my side.
>
> You will notice a lot of "test" stuff in the prompts - just erase it and
> replace it with your comments.
>
> There is still a bug with organisational applicants. it is in the process
> of being solved. However at this point anything that will make the pile of
> unprocessed applications, even if only for individuals, is a good idea.
>
> In terms of process, I suggest that we lower the pile by focusing first on
> those upon which we all agree (on way or another) For the yeses, Stephanie
> can give the final greenlight and I can proceed with the status change in
> the backend, along with mailing list registration, etc.
>
> For the other ones, we can discuss how we want to go about.
>
> Upon recommendation of Farzaneh, it is probably better to keep list and
> on-call exchanges about potential members to a minimum and keep such things
> in the back-end; I do believe mailing list and calls are public.
>
> Have a nice day,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-EC mailing list
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-EC mailing list
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20190219/2f594fe5/attachment.htm>