[NCSG-EC] NCSG Applicants guidelines

[Raoul Plommer]

Yes, I meant that I don't agree with any of the section five.

On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 17:12, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Raoul
>
> I shared two documents by the way. You probably agree with most of the
> applicants guidelines because that's how we now function (except Q5 which
> you disagree with) . It's the other procedures that might be problematic.
>
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:45 AM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The executive committee has to come up with guidelines based on which it
>> approves or rejects applicants. Applicants have asked for it and you need
>> to base your decision on something that is not ad hoc.
>>
>> I responded to section five issue on the mailing list.
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:40 AM Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Section five. I don't really agree on any of it. What's the rationale
>>> behind it?
>>>
>>> -Raoul
>>>
>>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 16:06, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Raoul
>>>>
>>>> To avoid confusion, can you reference the specific section you don't
>>>> agree with?
>>>>
>>>> We have a recategorization of membership, which Requires the individual
>>>> member who has become an official representative of the org to choose only
>>>> one kind of membership. So the  member goes from the category of individual
>>>> member to the category of organizational member.
>>>>
>>>> Then there are individual members whose organization is a member too.
>>>> In this case there is a difference between big and small organizations. If
>>>> you could point to the related paragraphs that can lead to repeat
>>>> applications then we can think about modifying them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> n Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:05 AM Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would not go for removing the dual membership. I see no harm in
>>>>> having the individual having a personal and an organisational identity in
>>>>> the NCSG. It will create many repeat applications from people that are
>>>>> already active in our community, when they change organisation or they want
>>>>> to give room for new organisational representatives. They would then have
>>>>> to apply again and that's just a waste of time for everyone. IF we need to
>>>>> change something about it, it would be to remove the voting right of the
>>>>> other identity, basically, whichever had less weight.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Raoul
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 01:16, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC <
>>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also shared this document with you:
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing about
>>>>>> the applicants' guidelines.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is really needed to avoid confusion. It was shared with the
>>>>>> mailing list a couple of months ago as well. If I don't receive an
>>>>>> objection from you by 14 September it will be deemed as approved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Farzaneh
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list
>>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> Farzaneh
>>>>
>>> --
>> Farzaneh
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20180909/a52aeca7/attachment.htm>