[NCSG-EC] NCSG Applicants guidelines

[farzaneh badii]

Raoul

I shared two documents by the way. You probably agree with most of the
applicants guidelines because that's how we now function (except Q5 which
you disagree with) . It's the other procedures that might be problematic.

On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:45 AM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
wrote:

> The executive committee has to come up with guidelines based on which it
> approves or rejects applicants. Applicants have asked for it and you need
> to base your decision on something that is not ad hoc.
>
> I responded to section five issue on the mailing list.
>
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:40 AM Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Section five. I don't really agree on any of it. What's the rationale
>> behind it?
>>
>> -Raoul
>>
>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 16:06, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Raoul
>>>
>>> To avoid confusion, can you reference the specific section you don't
>>> agree with?
>>>
>>> We have a recategorization of membership, which Requires the individual
>>> member who has become an official representative of the org to choose only
>>> one kind of membership. So the  member goes from the category of individual
>>> member to the category of organizational member.
>>>
>>> Then there are individual members whose organization is a member too. In
>>> this case there is a difference between big and small organizations. If you
>>> could point to the related paragraphs that can lead to repeat applications
>>> then we can think about modifying them.
>>>
>>>
>>> n Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:05 AM Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would not go for removing the dual membership. I see no harm in
>>>> having the individual having a personal and an organisational identity in
>>>> the NCSG. It will create many repeat applications from people that are
>>>> already active in our community, when they change organisation or they want
>>>> to give room for new organisational representatives. They would then have
>>>> to apply again and that's just a waste of time for everyone. IF we need to
>>>> change something about it, it would be to remove the voting right of the
>>>> other identity, basically, whichever had less weight.
>>>>
>>>> -Raoul
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 01:16, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC <
>>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I also shared this document with you:
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing about
>>>>> the applicants' guidelines.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is really needed to avoid confusion. It was shared with the mailing
>>>>> list a couple of months ago as well. If I don't receive an objection from
>>>>> you by 14 September it will be deemed as approved.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Farzaneh
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list
>>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>> --
> Farzaneh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20180909/f5ea682f/attachment.htm>