[NCSG-EC] NCSG Applicants guidelines

farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Sun Sep 9 16:45:16 EEST 2018


The executive committee has to come up with guidelines based on which it
approves or rejects applicants. Applicants have asked for it and you need
to base your decision on something that is not ad hoc.

I responded to section five issue on the mailing list.

On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:40 AM Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com> wrote:

> Section five. I don't really agree on any of it. What's the rationale
> behind it?
>
> -Raoul
>
> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 16:06, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Raoul
>>
>> To avoid confusion, can you reference the specific section you don't
>> agree with?
>>
>> We have a recategorization of membership, which Requires the individual
>> member who has become an official representative of the org to choose only
>> one kind of membership. So the  member goes from the category of individual
>> member to the category of organizational member.
>>
>> Then there are individual members whose organization is a member too. In
>> this case there is a difference between big and small organizations. If you
>> could point to the related paragraphs that can lead to repeat applications
>> then we can think about modifying them.
>>
>>
>> n Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:05 AM Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I would not go for removing the dual membership. I see no harm in having
>>> the individual having a personal and an organisational identity in the
>>> NCSG. It will create many repeat applications from people that are already
>>> active in our community, when they change organisation or they want to give
>>> room for new organisational representatives. They would then have to apply
>>> again and that's just a waste of time for everyone. IF we need to change
>>> something about it, it would be to remove the voting right of the other
>>> identity, basically, whichever had less weight.
>>>
>>> -Raoul
>>>
>>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 01:16, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC <
>>> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I also shared this document with you:
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing about
>>>> the applicants' guidelines.
>>>>
>>>> It is really needed to avoid confusion. It was shared with the mailing
>>>> list a couple of months ago as well. If I don't receive an objection from
>>>> you by 14 September it will be deemed as approved.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Farzaneh
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-EC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>>>>
>>> --
>> Farzaneh
>>
> --
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20180909/9471056d/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-EC mailing list