<div dir="ltr">Yes, I meant that I don't agree with any of the section five.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 17:12, farzaneh badii <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@gmail.com">farzaneh.badii@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="auto">Raoul </div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I shared two documents by the way. You probably agree with most of the <span class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"> applicants</span> guidelines because that's how we now function<span class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"> </span><span class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"> (except Q5 which you disagree with) </span>. It's the other procedures that might be problematic. </div></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:45 AM farzaneh badii <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@gmail.com" target="_blank">farzaneh.badii@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto">The executive committee has to come up with guidelines based on which it approves or rejects applicants. Applicants have asked for it and you need to base your decision on something that is not ad hoc. </div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I responded to section five issue on the mailing list. </div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 9:40 AM Raoul Plommer <<a href="mailto:plommer@gmail.com" target="_blank">plommer@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Section five. I don't really agree on any of it. What's the rationale behind it?</div><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>-Raoul</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 16:06, farzaneh badii <<a href="mailto:farzaneh.badii@gmail.com" target="_blank">farzaneh.badii@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto">Hi Raoul </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">To avoid confusion, can you reference the specific section you don't agree with? </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">We have a recategorization of membership, which Requires the individual member who has become an official representative of the org to choose only one kind of membership. So the member goes from the category of individual member to the category of organizational member. </div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Then there are individual members whose organization is a member too. In this case there is a difference between big and small organizations. If you could point to the related paragraphs that can lead to repeat applications then we can think about modifying them. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">n Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:05 AM Raoul Plommer <<a href="mailto:plommer@gmail.com" target="_blank">plommer@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I would not go for removing the dual membership. I see no harm in having the individual having a personal and an organisational identity in the NCSG. It will create many repeat applications from people that are already active in our community, when they change organisation or they want to give room for new organisational representatives. They would then have to apply again and that's just a waste of time for everyone. IF we need to change something about it, it would be to remove the voting right of the other identity, basically, whichever had less weight.<div><br></div><div>-Raoul</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 01:16, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC <<a href="mailto:ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is</a>> wrote:<br></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Hi everyone,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I also shared this document with you: <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing</a> about the applicants' guidelines. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">It is really needed to avoid confusion. It was shared with the mailing list a couple of months ago as well. If I don't receive an objection from you by 14 September it will be deemed as approved. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Best regards</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div><div dir="ltr" class="m_6852903222552347569m_-73831286152987899m_5312516956611432175m_-3916559275846280719m_-8431758147867154855m_-5767598757409036582m_-1329156812844819597gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Farzaneh </font></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
_______________________________________________<br>
NCSG-EC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is" target="_blank">NCSG-EC@lists.ncsg.is</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="m_6852903222552347569m_-73831286152987899m_5312516956611432175m_-3916559275846280719m_-8431758147867154855gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Farzaneh </font></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="m_6852903222552347569m_-73831286152987899m_5312516956611432175gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Farzaneh </font></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div>