[NCSG-EC] [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Ncph-intersessional2017] Board Seat Selection Process
matthew shears
mshears at cdt.org
Thu Feb 23 12:49:50 EET 2017
Perhaps as a first step go back to CSG and say we are considering/or not
their doc and will be proposing something or an alternative version -
and put some deadline on it for us - maybe end of next week?
And, try to get agreement on a nomination period - say next week? or
two weeks from Monday? Probably would be useful to have the CSG and
NCSG nomination periods run in parallel. Agree with CSG whether should
be nomination and/or self nomination.
In the interim start work on the process?
Matthew
On 23/02/2017 08:07, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we really need to develop our response or proposal to CSG quickly. at
> least covering the topic of nomination.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-02-22 11:27 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> thanks for the response, looking for other comments on this topic.
> I think we can start with nomination whole we work on the process
> and adjust the whole timeline.
> how we shall proceed for nominations, we have 2 candidates for
> now. shall we initiate a process to find other candidates? we
> don't have so much time for a long nomination period.
>
> I understand that we are having the deadline as a mean to press us
> but we should stand and be clear about the aspects which are
> non-negotiable with regard to the process.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-02-21 19:13 GMT+09:00 matthew shears <mshears at cdt.org
> <mailto:mshears at cdt.org>>:
>
> Thanks Rafik
>
> Not sure much was agreed except that we need to deal with it
> and we are running out of time.
>
> First we had the timeline from Greg before the meeting, which
> was not really discussed further. Then we had some general
> discussion about the need to do something on the Board
> selection process. People voiced their views on different
> aspects of the process and there was concern over the
> timeline, but we did not really decide anything (others please
> jump in as I may have missed some important aspects). Markus
> announced he wanted to continue in the role; I announced I was
> going to run. Then the CSG proposal for a process was
> circulated on Thurs AM. There seemed to be general agreement
> that the CSG proposal was not ideal.
>
> I think the key immediate thing is us agreeing a process and
> timeline for nominations and getting that announced, so at
> least the initial stages of the process are underway.
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 20/02/2017 10:56, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> We got this note from Greg to resume the discussion on board
>> seat election.
>> First thing, is it possible to get a summary of what or not
>> agreed on iceland on that regard from those who attended
>> intersessional?
>>
>> We also need to outline what are our non-negotiable points
>> such as having vote, NCA participation and so on.
>>
>> I think tgat the CSG proposal from last week is far from our
>> expectations.
>> There is also proposal to have a call. We can have it by end
>> of this week but we do need to be ready.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>> <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>>
>> Date: Feb 20, 2017 2:13 PM
>> Subject: [Ncph-intersessional2017] Board Seat Selection Process
>> To: <ncph-intersessional2017 at icann.org
>> <mailto:ncph-intersessional2017 at icann.org>>
>> Cc:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> We probably need a different mailing list to finish
>> working on the Board Seat selection process, and a small
>> group to do it, but I'll start here, since I think this
>> is the only active mailing list with both sides of the
>> NCPH on it.
>>
>> We basically have no time to work this out, and we've
>> already started the process without knowing what it is
>> exactly, since we have now received nominations.
>>
>> In addition to the adaptation of the CPH procedures
>> previously circulated, I'm also attaching the following
>> for consideration:
>>
>> 1. Some bullet-points from an exchange between CSG and
>> NCSG representatives outlining a potential draft process.
>> 2. The latest version of the ICANN Staff Memo with a
>> revised draft timeline and some relevant excerpts from
>> Bylaws and GNSO Procedures.
>> 3. A further excerpt from the Bylaws, with Section
>> 11.3(f), which covers the selection process for Seats
>> 13-14 (to the extent that is covered in the Bylaws), and
>> Section 11.3(h), which is referred to in Section 11.3(f).
>>
>> A few thoughts and comments:
>>
>> A. We only have 10 1/2 weeks to both develop and go
>> through a process that is contemplated to take 21 weeks
>> (just to go through). Talk about building the airplane
>> in the air.
>>
>> B. At the Intersessional, we discussed possible
>> adjustments to the timeline, but did not come to any
>> decisions. It's not clear to me whether Staff is
>> preparing a further revised draft. I'll ask.
>>
>> C. If any of our groups have not already done so, we
>> should put out a call for any other nominations ASAP
>> (though it would be nice to know the end of the
>> nomination period).
>>
>> D. Without making any judgments, the CPH process and the
>> NCPH bullet-points are significantly different when it
>> comes to voting.
>>
>> E. We should figure out how to get this process agreed as
>> quickly as possible. Given the unusual circumstances, we
>> don't need to use this process as precedent for any
>> future process. We just need to get through this
>> selection. One approach is for NCSG to respond to the
>> draft sent at the end of the Intersessional. However,
>> given the gap between that and the bullet-points, it
>> might just be better to arrange a call/Adobe Connect
>> session ASAP to move the ball forward.
>>
>> Thanks for reading,
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> P.S. It's not all that important how we got here, but
>> nonetheless, it should be noted that the GNSO Procedures
>> were never updated from 2012, when the Bylaws deadline
>> for naming the Director was changed from one month to two
>> months (briefly) and then six months prior to being
>> seated. (The GNSO Procedures will need to be updated in
>> any event, since the Bylaws references are now
>> obsolete.)) The draft bullet-points repeated this error.
>>
>> B. Since we are doing this with very little time
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Greg Shatan
>> *C: 917-816-6428
>> S: gsshatan
>> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
>> gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: *Greg Shatan* <gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>> <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>>
>> Date: Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:28 AM
>> Subject: Discussion Draft of Interim Board Selection Process
>> To: ncph-intersessional2017 at icann.org
>> <mailto:ncph-intersessional2017 at icann.org>
>>
>>
>> NCSG/NCUC/NPOC Intersessional Participants,
>>
>> The CSG prepared a "discussion draft" of a proposed
>> interim Board Selection Process based closely on the
>> Final Process adopted by the Contracted Parties House.
>> Clean and marked drafts are attached, showing changes
>> from the CPH document.
>>
>> A Google Docs version can be found here, where any
>> suggested changes can be added in "suggest" mode (but
>> everyone has "edit" rights):
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lx8jCTEWGAuPyPpnL_RaHGum4dQXf2a1MTyYXx8O9dc/edit?usp=sharing>
>>
>> We would hope to use this for the current 2017 Board Seat
>> process and then revisit afterward before making it a
>> permanent rather than "interim" process.
>>
>> This has not been reviewed by the membership of the IPC,
>> BC and ISPCP, but we wanted to start the discussion on
>> this basis, given the short amount of time we have for
>> this year.
>>
>> We look forward to your thoughts.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Greg (on behalf of BC/IPC/ISPCP Intersessional Teams)
>>
>> *Greg Shatan
>> *C: 917-816-6428 <tel:%28917%29%20816-6428>
>> S: gsshatan
>> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 <tel:%28646%29%20845-9428>
>> gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncph-intersessional2017 mailing list
>> Ncph-intersessional2017 at icann.org
>> <mailto:Ncph-intersessional2017 at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017
>> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncph-intersessional2017>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>> <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>
> --
> ------------
> Matthew Shears
> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
> + 44 771 2472987 <tel:+44%207712%20472987>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
--
------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/attachments/20170223/d85852f7/attachment.htm>
More information about the NCSG-EC
mailing list