FW: Draft Comments - FW: Transfer Policy Review Preliminary Report - NCSG Public Comment Discussion

Wed Sep 25 18:50:56 EEST 2024

Apologies for missing the meeting.

I will do my best to read the reworked comments, but I want to respond
briefly to your comment on the 30 days.

We should factor out the following questions and processes:

Question: What is the communication strategy to ensure the non-commercial
registered name user respond to any supposed malicious transfer? Would it
be once? When does it start counting? How sure are we that such mails do
not go to junk or spam mail?

>From experience, I failed to respond to an ownership and my domain name was
restricted from use. My website stopped loading and my mails failed.
Apparently, the initial mail sent went to junk.

If the policy reflects a mandatory communication strategy, it may help the
seemingly non-commercial registered name holder an opportunity to respond
on time to a malicious domain name transfer.

My 2kobo!

On Thu, Sep 26, 2024, 12:31 AM Ken Herman <ken at kherman.com> wrote:

> Dear NCSG Members
>
>
>
> I would like to thank everyone who attended today’s session on the
> Transfer Policy Review. I hope you all found the presentation useful and
> for those unable to make it, Andrea has circulated a link to the recording.
>
>
>
> As a result of this review, and after examining the process for submitting
> comments, I have reworked and edited the responses, and you can find it at
> this link:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uM38-A98TYK-bED30l4Ue1cFJdNuHaZl/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105988793481216121706&rtpof=true&sd=true
>
>
>
> As you will see, we won’t be uploading this document per se, but the
> comments remain basically the same.
>
>
>
> Please have a look and provide any comments in the document or to me by
> 23:00 UTC on Sunday, September 29, 2024. This will give me time to
> incorporate into the responses prior to the submission deadline on Monday,
> September 30.
>
>
>
> Thanks again and I look forward to any input you may have.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> *From:* NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> *On Behalf Of *Ken
> Herman
> *Sent:* Monday, September 23, 2024 7:44 PM
> *To:* NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> *Subject:* Draft Comments - FW: Transfer Policy Review Preliminary Report
> - NCSG Public Comment Discussion
>
>
>
> Hello again fellow NCSG members
>
>
>
> In preparation for our discussion on Wednesday, or as a way for members
> unable to attend to contribute, you can find in the link below some
> suggested text for our public comment.
>
>
>
>    - Link Removed
>
>
>
> The public comment is due next Monday, September 30, 2024, so I welcome
> any additional points that you feel are important to raise for this policy.
>
>
>
> One aspect of the policy that I have been wondering about is the transfer
> restrictions imposed after registration or a transfer. The recommendation
> regarding this aspect of the policy imposes a 30-day restriction (with some
> exceptions, which you can see I addressed in the draft comments). I have no
> issue with the restriction itself, but my question is whether or not
> 30-days (720 hours) is enough time. Keeping in mind that the transfer
> restrictions are in place for security reasons, my experience is that the
> average non-commercial registered name holder does not have substantial
> knowledge of domain name management activities and may take some time to
> understand what might be happening in the case of a malicious transfer.
> Therefore, would 30 days be enough time to understand the issues and
> respond? If not, what timeframe would be better and why? Or, is my
> assumption incorrect and 30 days is generally sufficient.
>
>
>
> Your thoughts on this, or any of the other policy recommendations, are
> most welcome and I look forward to our discussion on Wednesday.
>
>
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> *On Behalf Of *Ken
> Herman
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 19, 2024 11:47 PM
> *To:* NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> *Subject:* Transfer Policy Review Preliminary Report - NCSG Public
> Comment Discussion
>
>
>
> Dear fellow NCSG members:
>
>
>
> As I reported previously, the Transfer Policy review Working Group (TPR
> WG) has completed its consideration of the issues outlined in its charter
> and have produced its preliminary report. We are now in the public comment
> period for this report, which closes at the end of September. Recently, the
> TPR WG support team have run two webinars describing the recommendations,
> along with an opportunity to ask questions. The links to the recordings of
> these webinars are below.
>
>
>
> As the deadline for comments approaches, your TPR WG NCSG representatives
> (Juan and I) welcome all NCSG members to a working session to consider any
> issues we may wish to include in our public comment contribution.
>
>
>
> We have arranged the call for Wednesday, September 25, 2024 @ 13:30 UTC
> with the connection details below. I have also requested Andrea to send
> these details as calendar invitations.
>
>
>
> For your reference I have placed below links to the relevant materials,
> including the NCSG public comment to the interim report published in 2022.
>
>
>
> I look forward to your participation in this discussion, but if you cannot
> attend we welcome any written comments anyone may have.
>
>
>
> As always, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> Join Zoom Meeting: *https://icann.zoom.us/j/98878189584?pwd=ZVpkSVVuaXVqeGRMelNEWW1LMkxQUT09
> <https://icann.zoom.us/j/98878189584?pwd=ZVpkSVVuaXVqeGRMelNEWW1LMkxQUT09>*
>
> Meeting ID: 988 7818 9584
>
> Passcode: i!y7.qx+11
>
>
>
> One tap mobile
>
> +16699006833,,98878189584#,,,,,,0#,,7740925615# US (San Jose)
>
> +12532158782,,98878189584#,,,,,,0#,,7740925615# US (Tacoma)
>
> PHONE ONLY DETAILS:
>
> Find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/ayKmeftWg
>
> Meeting ID: 988 7818 9584
>
> Phone only Passcode: 7740925615
>
>
>
> Transfer Policy Review PDP Page:
> https://community.icann.org/display/TPRPDP/Transfer+Policy+Review+PDP
>
>
>
> TPR Public Comment page:
>
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/initial-report-on-the-transfer-policy-review-01-08-2024
>
>
>
> Transfer Policy Review Webinar 1: https://community.icann.org/x/OgKkFQ
>
>
>
> Transfer Policy Review Webinar 2: https://community.icann.org/x/PAKkFQ
>
>
>
> NCSG Response to preliminary report in 2022:
> https://itp.cdn.icann.org/public-comment/proceeding/Initial%20Report%20on%20the%20Transfer%20Policy%20Review%20-%20Phase%201(a)-21-06-2022/submissions/NCSG/NCSG%20Response%20-%20Transfer%20Policy%20Review-15-08-2022.pdf
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20240925/993e27a1/attachment.htm>