FW: Draft Comments - FW: Transfer Policy Review Preliminary Report - NCSG Public Comment Discussion

Wed Sep 25 18:30:50 EEST 2024

Dear NCSG Members

I would like to thank everyone who attended today's session on the Transfer
Policy Review. I hope you all found the presentation useful and for those
unable to make it, Andrea has circulated a link to the recording.

As a result of this review, and after examining the process for submitting
comments, I have reworked and edited the responses, and you can find it at
this link:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uM38-A98TYK-bED30l4Ue1cFJdNuHaZl/edit?us
p=sharing
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uM38-A98TYK-bED30l4Ue1cFJdNuHaZl/edit?u
sp=sharing&ouid=105988793481216121706&rtpof=true&sd=true>
&ouid=105988793481216121706&rtpof=true&sd=true

As you will see, we won't be uploading this document per se, but the
comments remain basically the same.

Please have a look and provide any comments in the document or to me by
23:00 UTC on Sunday, September 29, 2024. This will give me time to
incorporate into the responses prior to the submission deadline on Monday,
September 30.

Thanks again and I look forward to any input you may have.

Best regards

Ken

From: NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> On Behalf Of Ken Herman
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2024 7:44 PM
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: Draft Comments - FW: Transfer Policy Review Preliminary Report -
NCSG Public Comment Discussion

Hello again fellow NCSG members

In preparation for our discussion on Wednesday, or as a way for members
unable to attend to contribute, you can find in the link below some
suggested text for our public comment.

*	Link Removed

The public comment is due next Monday, September 30, 2024, so I welcome any
additional points that you feel are important to raise for this policy.

One aspect of the policy that I have been wondering about is the transfer
restrictions imposed after registration or a transfer. The recommendation
regarding this aspect of the policy imposes a 30-day restriction (with some
exceptions, which you can see I addressed in the draft comments). I have no
issue with the restriction itself, but my question is whether or not 30-days
(720 hours) is enough time. Keeping in mind that the transfer restrictions
are in place for security reasons, my experience is that the average
non-commercial registered name holder does not have substantial knowledge of
domain name management activities and may take some time to understand what
might be happening in the case of a malicious transfer. Therefore, would 30
days be enough time to understand the issues and respond? If not, what
timeframe would be better and why? Or, is my assumption incorrect and 30
days is generally sufficient.

Your thoughts on this, or any of the other policy recommendations, are most
welcome and I look forward to our discussion on Wednesday.

Best regards.

Ken

From: NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> > On Behalf Of Ken Herman
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2024 11:47 PM
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> 
Subject: Transfer Policy Review Preliminary Report - NCSG Public Comment
Discussion

Dear fellow NCSG members:

As I reported previously, the Transfer Policy review Working Group (TPR WG)
has completed its consideration of the issues outlined in its charter and
have produced its preliminary report. We are now in the public comment
period for this report, which closes at the end of September. Recently, the
TPR WG support team have run two webinars describing the recommendations,
along with an opportunity to ask questions. The links to the recordings of
these webinars are below.

As the deadline for comments approaches, your TPR WG NCSG representatives
(Juan and I) welcome all NCSG members to a working session to consider any
issues we may wish to include in our public comment contribution.

We have arranged the call for Wednesday, September 25, 2024 @ 13:30 UTC with
the connection details below. I have also requested Andrea to send these
details as calendar invitations.

For your reference I have placed below links to the relevant materials,
including the NCSG public comment to the interim report published in 2022.

I look forward to your participation in this discussion, but if you cannot
attend we welcome any written comments anyone may have.

As always, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Best regards

Ken

Join Zoom Meeting:
https://icann.zoom.us/j/98878189584?pwd=ZVpkSVVuaXVqeGRMelNEWW1LMkxQUT09

Meeting ID: 988 7818 9584

Passcode: i!y7.qx+11

One tap mobile

+16699006833,,98878189584#,,,,,,0#,,7740925615# US (San Jose)

+12532158782,,98878189584#,,,,,,0#,,7740925615# US (Tacoma)

PHONE ONLY DETAILS:

Find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/ayKmeftWg

Meeting ID: 988 7818 9584

Phone only Passcode: 7740925615

Transfer Policy Review PDP Page:
https://community.icann.org/display/TPRPDP/Transfer+Policy+Review+PDP

TPR Public Comment page:

https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/initial-report-on-the-tra
nsfer-policy-review-01-08-2024

Transfer Policy Review Webinar 1: https://community.icann.org/x/OgKkFQ

Transfer Policy Review Webinar 2: https://community.icann.org/x/PAKkFQ

NCSG Response to preliminary report in 2022:
https://itp.cdn.icann.org/public-comment/proceeding/Initial%20Report%20on%20
the%20Transfer%20Policy%20Review%20-%20Phase%201(a)-21-06-2022/submissions/N
CSG/NCSG%20Response%20-%20Transfer%20Policy%20Review-15-08-2022.pdf

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20240925/7a987996/attachment.htm>