[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: [Gnso-coordination] Continuous improvement principles re GNSO & Council
Johan Helsingius
julf at JULF.COM
Tue Oct 8 10:57:23 EEST 2024
Oh, and to complicate things even more, seems ALAC is represented
by 6 reps - one for ALAC itself and one each for AFRALO, APRALO,
EURALO, LACRALO and NARALO (with alternates).
We could also have had a NCSG rep in addition to NCUC and
NPOC reps.
Julf
On 10/8/24 17:51, Johan Helsingius wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> This is not the Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing
> Continuous Improvement (CCOICI) but the Continuous Improvement
> Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG).
>
> Yes, it is confusing!
>
> Nominally the CIP-CCG (as well as the CCOICI) is put together based on
> on constituencies, so it has separate NCUC (Benjamin, with Liubomir as
> alternate) and NPOC (Caleb with Wisdom as alternate) representatives,
> but just as with council, we should treat them as representing
> a common NCSG view.
>
> Julf
>
> On 10/8/24 14:05, Pedro de Perdigão Lana wrote:
>> Hi Julf,
>>
>> Manju is the chair, Juan Rojas is there as NPOC, and Wisdom is there as
>> NCUC.
>>
>> Cordially,
>>
>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
>> Researcher
>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>> Coordination/Board/EC @ISOC BR <https://isoc.org.br/>,NCUC
>> <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN),
>> YouthLACIGF <https://youthlacigf.lat/>,IODA <https://ioda.org.br/> and
>> CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>
>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received
>> by mistake, please reply informing it.
>>
>>
>> Em ter., 8 de out. de 2024 às 04:36, Johan Helsingius
>> <00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu
>> <mailto:00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu>> escreveu:
>>
>> Hi Benjamin,
>>
>> Thanks for posting this!
>>
>> I am copying the NCSG list as well, as this is something we probably
>> should coordinate on a NCSG level. Can you remind me who our other
>> representatives on this group are?
>>
>> Julf
>>
>>
>> On 10/7/24 08:44, Benjamin Akinmoyeje wrote:
>> > Dear NCUC members,
>> > I would like input in deciding whether all these principles are
>> > appropriate. This request had been sent out previously however the
>> > emphasis is on number 4.
>> >
>> > This is the question the GNSO participants in the
>> > ContinuousImprovement Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG)
>> > like to know. You can know more about
>> *ContinuousImprovement** Program
>> > Community Coordination Group* (CIP-CCG) can be found on this link
>> > <https://community.icann.org/display/CIP
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/CIP>> below
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 1.
>> >
>> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is fulfilling its purpose.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2.
>> >
>> > The structures of SO, AC, or NomCom are effective.
>> >
>> > 3.
>> >
>> > The operations of SO, AC, or NomCom are efficient.
>> >
>> > 4.
>> >
>> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is accountable internally to its
>> stakeholders
>> > and substructures (where applicable), and externally to the wider
>> > ICANN community in benefit of the global Internet population.
>> >
>> > 5.
>> >
>> > The SO, AC, or NomCom collaborates to further the mission of
>> ICANN.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> > From: *Chris Disspain via Gnso-coordination*
>> > <gnso-coordination at icann.org <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>
>> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>>
>> > Date: Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 11:14 AM
>> > Subject: [Gnso-coordination] Continuous improvement principles re
>> GNSO &
>> > Council
>> > To: <gnso-coordination at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>
>> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Hello All,
>> >
>> > As previously discussed, our job as the GNSO SG reps to the
>> Continuous
>> > Improvement CCG is to agree a set of principles that will apply
>> to the
>> > GNSO and GNSO Council’s continuous improvement efforts.
>> >
>> > The current principles from the draft CIP CCG document are below.
>> > Bearing in mind that the GNSO CCOICI will be the group that
>> develops the
>> > criteria that sit under the principles and that, whilst not
>> essential,
>> > it would be optimal if the overarching principles were the same
>> for all
>> > SOs and ACs, can we live with these and if not, what amendments
>> would we
>> > like to see?
>> >
>> > It would be great to hear back from everyone by next Tuesday 1st
>> October
>> > so we can feed our comments into the next CIP meeting on 2nd.
>> >
>> >
>> > 1.
>> >
>> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is fulfilling its purpose.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2.
>> >
>> > The structures of SO, AC, or NomCom are effective.
>> >
>> > 3.
>> >
>> > The operations of SO, AC, or NomCom are efficient.
>> >
>> > 4.
>> >
>> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is accountable internally to its
>> stakeholders
>> > and substructures (where applicable), and externally to the wider
>> > ICANN community in benefit of the global Internet population.
>> >
>> > 5.
>> >
>> > The SO, AC, or NomCom collaborates to further the mission of
>> ICANN.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Chris
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Gnso-coordination mailing list -- gnso-coordination at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>
>> > <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>
>> > To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org>
>> > <mailto:gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org>>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> <https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list