[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: [Gnso-coordination] Continuous improvement principles re GNSO & Council
Pedro de Perdigão Lana
pedrodeperdigaolana at GMAIL.COM
Tue Oct 8 19:00:29 EEST 2024
Oops, sorry, my bad - had a quick look online while trying to help, but
confused myself on the way ;)
Thanks for the correction,
*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR <https://isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
<https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN),
YouthLACIGF <https://youthlacigf.lat/>, IODA <https://ioda.org.br/> and CC
Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.
Em ter., 8 de out. de 2024 às 12:57, Johan Helsingius <
00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu> escreveu:
> Oh, and to complicate things even more, seems ALAC is represented
> by 6 reps - one for ALAC itself and one each for AFRALO, APRALO,
> EURALO, LACRALO and NARALO (with alternates).
>
> We could also have had a NCSG rep in addition to NCUC and
> NPOC reps.
>
> Julf
>
>
> On 10/8/24 17:51, Johan Helsingius wrote:
> > Hi Pedro,
> >
> > This is not the Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing
> > Continuous Improvement (CCOICI) but the Continuous Improvement
> > Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG).
> >
> > Yes, it is confusing!
> >
> > Nominally the CIP-CCG (as well as the CCOICI) is put together based on
> > on constituencies, so it has separate NCUC (Benjamin, with Liubomir as
> > alternate) and NPOC (Caleb with Wisdom as alternate) representatives,
> > but just as with council, we should treat them as representing
> > a common NCSG view.
> >
> > Julf
> >
> > On 10/8/24 14:05, Pedro de Perdigão Lana wrote:
> >> Hi Julf,
> >>
> >> Manju is the chair, Juan Rojas is there as NPOC, and Wisdom is there as
> >> NCUC.
> >>
> >> Cordially,
> >>
> >> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> >> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
> >> Researcher
> >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
> >> Coordination/Board/EC @ISOC BR <https://isoc.org.br/>,NCUC
> >> <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
> >> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN),
> >> YouthLACIGF <https://youthlacigf.lat/>,IODA <https://ioda.org.br/> and
> >> CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>
> >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received
> >> by mistake, please reply informing it.
> >>
> >>
> >> Em ter., 8 de out. de 2024 às 04:36, Johan Helsingius
> >> <00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu
> >> <mailto:00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu>> escreveu:
> >>
> >> Hi Benjamin,
> >>
> >> Thanks for posting this!
> >>
> >> I am copying the NCSG list as well, as this is something we
> probably
> >> should coordinate on a NCSG level. Can you remind me who our other
> >> representatives on this group are?
> >>
> >> Julf
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/7/24 08:44, Benjamin Akinmoyeje wrote:
> >> > Dear NCUC members,
> >> > I would like input in deciding whether all these principles are
> >> > appropriate. This request had been sent out previously however
> the
> >> > emphasis is on number 4.
> >> >
> >> > This is the question the GNSO participants in the
> >> > ContinuousImprovement Program Community Coordination Group
> (CIP-CCG)
> >> > like to know. You can know more about
> >> *ContinuousImprovement** Program
> >> > Community Coordination Group* (CIP-CCG) can be found on this
> link
> >> > <https://community.icann.org/display/CIP
> >> <https://community.icann.org/display/CIP>> below
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 1.
> >> >
> >> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is fulfilling its purpose.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2.
> >> >
> >> > The structures of SO, AC, or NomCom are effective.
> >> >
> >> > 3.
> >> >
> >> > The operations of SO, AC, or NomCom are efficient.
> >> >
> >> > 4.
> >> >
> >> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is accountable internally to its
> >> stakeholders
> >> > and substructures (where applicable), and externally to the
> wider
> >> > ICANN community in benefit of the global Internet
> population.
> >> >
> >> > 5.
> >> >
> >> > The SO, AC, or NomCom collaborates to further the mission of
> >> ICANN.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> >> > From: *Chris Disspain via Gnso-coordination*
> >> > <gnso-coordination at icann.org <mailto:
> gnso-coordination at icann.org>
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>>
> >> > Date: Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 11:14 AM
> >> > Subject: [Gnso-coordination] Continuous improvement principles
> re
> >> GNSO &
> >> > Council
> >> > To: <gnso-coordination at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hello All,
> >> >
> >> > As previously discussed, our job as the GNSO SG reps to the
> >> Continuous
> >> > Improvement CCG is to agree a set of principles that will apply
> >> to the
> >> > GNSO and GNSO Council’s continuous improvement efforts.
> >> >
> >> > The current principles from the draft CIP CCG document are
> below.
> >> > Bearing in mind that the GNSO CCOICI will be the group that
> >> develops the
> >> > criteria that sit under the principles and that, whilst not
> >> essential,
> >> > it would be optimal if the overarching principles were the same
> >> for all
> >> > SOs and ACs, can we live with these and if not, what amendments
> >> would we
> >> > like to see?
> >> >
> >> > It would be great to hear back from everyone by next Tuesday 1st
> >> October
> >> > so we can feed our comments into the next CIP meeting on 2nd.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 1.
> >> >
> >> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is fulfilling its purpose.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2.
> >> >
> >> > The structures of SO, AC, or NomCom are effective.
> >> >
> >> > 3.
> >> >
> >> > The operations of SO, AC, or NomCom are efficient.
> >> >
> >> > 4.
> >> >
> >> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is accountable internally to its
> >> stakeholders
> >> > and substructures (where applicable), and externally to the
> wider
> >> > ICANN community in benefit of the global Internet
> population.
> >> >
> >> > 5.
> >> >
> >> > The SO, AC, or NomCom collaborates to further the mission of
> >> ICANN.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Chris
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Gnso-coordination mailing list -- gnso-coordination at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>
> >> > <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>
> >> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org>
> >> > <mailto:gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org>>
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> >> > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> >
> >> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> >> <https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
> >>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20241008/d80f6116/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list