[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: [Gnso-coordination] Continuous improvement principles re GNSO & Council
Johan Helsingius
julf at JULF.COM
Tue Oct 8 10:51:29 EEST 2024
Hi Pedro,
This is not the Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing
Continuous Improvement (CCOICI) but the Continuous Improvement
Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG).
Yes, it is confusing!
Nominally the CIP-CCG (as well as the CCOICI) is put together based on
on constituencies, so it has separate NCUC (Benjamin, with Liubomir as
alternate) and NPOC (Caleb with Wisdom as alternate) representatives,
but just as with council, we should treat them as representing
a common NCSG view.
Julf
On 10/8/24 14:05, Pedro de Perdigão Lana wrote:
> Hi Julf,
>
> Manju is the chair, Juan Rojas is there as NPOC, and Wisdom is there as
> NCUC.
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
> Researcher
> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
> Coordination/Board/EC @ISOC BR <https://isoc.org.br/>,NCUC
> <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN),
> YouthLACIGF <https://youthlacigf.lat/>,IODA <https://ioda.org.br/> and
> CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>
> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received
> by mistake, please reply informing it.
>
>
> Em ter., 8 de out. de 2024 às 04:36, Johan Helsingius
> <00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu
> <mailto:00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu>> escreveu:
>
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> Thanks for posting this!
>
> I am copying the NCSG list as well, as this is something we probably
> should coordinate on a NCSG level. Can you remind me who our other
> representatives on this group are?
>
> Julf
>
>
> On 10/7/24 08:44, Benjamin Akinmoyeje wrote:
> > Dear NCUC members,
> > I would like input in deciding whether all these principles are
> > appropriate. This request had been sent out previously however the
> > emphasis is on number 4.
> >
> > This is the question the GNSO participants in the
> > ContinuousImprovement Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG)
> > like to know. You can know more about
> *ContinuousImprovement** Program
> > Community Coordination Group* (CIP-CCG) can be found on this link
> > <https://community.icann.org/display/CIP
> <https://community.icann.org/display/CIP>> below
> >
> >
> >
> > 1.
> >
> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is fulfilling its purpose.
> >
> >
> > 2.
> >
> > The structures of SO, AC, or NomCom are effective.
> >
> > 3.
> >
> > The operations of SO, AC, or NomCom are efficient.
> >
> > 4.
> >
> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is accountable internally to its
> stakeholders
> > and substructures (where applicable), and externally to the wider
> > ICANN community in benefit of the global Internet population.
> >
> > 5.
> >
> > The SO, AC, or NomCom collaborates to further the mission of
> ICANN.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > From: *Chris Disspain via Gnso-coordination*
> > <gnso-coordination at icann.org <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>
> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>>
> > Date: Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 11:14 AM
> > Subject: [Gnso-coordination] Continuous improvement principles re
> GNSO &
> > Council
> > To: <gnso-coordination at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>
> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>>
> >
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > As previously discussed, our job as the GNSO SG reps to the
> Continuous
> > Improvement CCG is to agree a set of principles that will apply
> to the
> > GNSO and GNSO Council’s continuous improvement efforts.
> >
> > The current principles from the draft CIP CCG document are below.
> > Bearing in mind that the GNSO CCOICI will be the group that
> develops the
> > criteria that sit under the principles and that, whilst not
> essential,
> > it would be optimal if the overarching principles were the same
> for all
> > SOs and ACs, can we live with these and if not, what amendments
> would we
> > like to see?
> >
> > It would be great to hear back from everyone by next Tuesday 1st
> October
> > so we can feed our comments into the next CIP meeting on 2nd.
> >
> >
> > 1.
> >
> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is fulfilling its purpose.
> >
> >
> > 2.
> >
> > The structures of SO, AC, or NomCom are effective.
> >
> > 3.
> >
> > The operations of SO, AC, or NomCom are efficient.
> >
> > 4.
> >
> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is accountable internally to its
> stakeholders
> > and substructures (where applicable), and externally to the wider
> > ICANN community in benefit of the global Internet population.
> >
> > 5.
> >
> > The SO, AC, or NomCom collaborates to further the mission of
> ICANN.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnso-coordination mailing list -- gnso-coordination at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>
> > <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>
> > To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org>
> > <mailto:gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org>>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> <https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list