[NCUC-DISCUSS] NomCom changes

[Remmy Nweke]

Hi Judith
This is not true please.
Rebalancing was a key issue from us and it's unkind to say one was not
there during decision making or recommendations. I followed most of
the meetings. At least I can speak for myself.
___________________
REMMY NWEKE,  *mNUJ, mNGE, mGOCOP*
Lead Consulting Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
*ITREALMS Media* group [*Multiple-award winning medium*]
(ITREALMS <http://www.itrealms.com.ng/>, DigitalSENSE Business Magazine
<http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; NaijaAgroNet
<http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng/>)
No. 36 Afariogun Street, Oshodi-Lagos
M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, T: @ITRealms
<http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
@DigitalSENSEng
2023 *Nigeria DigitalSENSE Forum on IG4D*, Thursday June 8
<https://www.itrealms.com.ng/>
2023 *ITREALMS* e-Waste Dialogue, Thursday December 7
<https://www.itrealms.com.ng/>
@Welcome Center Hotels, Int'l Airport Road, Lagos-Nigeria
<http://welcomecentrehotels.com/>
Former Vice President, African Civil Society on Information Society (ACSIS)
______________________________________________________________
*Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments
are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended
only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal
responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do
not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make
any copies. Violators may face court persecution.


On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 8:11 PM Judith Hellerstein <judith at jhellerstein.com>
wrote:

> Hi Julf,
> Caleb was right. These actions occurred during the NomCom Review
> Committee.  there were many protests by other groups and as NCSG or NPOC
> did not have a rep on this committee or if they did the rep was not active
> so when these decisions were made to take out the rebalancing from the
> recommendations there was no one there to oppose it and change people’s
> minds. I had asked this question when the public comment first came out and
> it had the rebalancing issues still there by mistake and this is the
> answers and information I was given by the people on the committee.
>
> As such Rebalancing was removed from the recommendations and was taken out
> of the public comment.  As much issues were made after the fact, it was
> decided that advice would be sought from each of the SOs and ACs and other
> groups on how best to do the rebalancing.  That advice was given but not
> sure whatever happened to it.
>
> We will just have to wait for an answer from theCEO and Board.
>
> Best,
> Judith
> Sent from my iPad
> judith at jhellerstein.com
> Skype ID:JudithHellerstein
>
> On Jun 5, 2024, at 2:46 PM, Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele <
> muyiwacaleb at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> Hi Julf,
>
> The board did not remove any recommendations. A vote was put forward in
> the NomCom RIWG from what I understand and we did not have an NCSG rep on
> the ground during that meeting the recommendation votes were maded to push
> for a consensus to retain recommendation 10l
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 1:30 PM Johan Helsingius via Ncuc-discuss <
> ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for the useful information, Remmy,
>>
>> > The final recommendations were made including our desire to increase
>> and
>> > re-balance the slots and were submitted to the ICANN board and it did
>> > not sail through as expected. (Raoul Plommer can also add a voice here)
>>
>> I am, like Pedro, a bit confused about this - did the team actually
>> recommend re-balancing, but the board removed it, or did the team
>> decide to remove the recommendation from the final version that
>> went to the board?
>>
>> > On the call for term duration, I would advise that current appointees
>> > have 1 additional year, since that would mean they are not returning
>> and
>> > must have availed some ‘knowledge transfer’ on the new or incoming
>> > appointees before their final exit thereafter.
>>
>> That would be the sensible thing to do, yes, but that doesn't seem
>> to be what the recommendation says.
>>
>>         Julf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>
>
> --
> *Caleb Ogundele*
> Email: muyiwacaleb at gmail.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20240605/74688d6b/attachment.htm>