Suggested amendments to ICANN's bylaws and NomCom

[Akinremi Peter Taiwo]

Thanks Raoul for bringing this here.

Since the bylaw amendment is tilting towards GNSO appointment to NomCom,
can this development increase nomcomercial number of seats on the NomCom
and how would GNSO made the selection.

Would GNSO uses Standing selection committee for the selection. And with
what criteria?

And since Non commercial have been advocating for one more seat, this would
be a good opportunity to made substantial comment in term of how this
should be handled at the GNSO

The Non commercial house need to strategically position to influence as to
increase number of seats on the nomcom.


Regards.

On Mon, 24 Apr 2023, 20:28 Raoul Plommer, <plommer at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> It looks like the proposed amendment to ICANN's bylaws is going to take
> out the specific composition of the seven NomCom delegates and shift the
> decision on the number of representatives to the GNSO.
>
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf
> see pg. 4.
>
> The public comment is here:
> https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023
>
> It might be a good time to approach the CPH once again about this and
> agree to lessen the CSG's representation in the NCSG's favor? :-)
>
> The public comment period closes on the 29th of May.
>
> -Raoul
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20230426/dcfb462b/attachment.htm>