SOI Task Force response

[Glenn Ricart]

I would not use the "charged" term "laughable".  I might say that
conflating ... and .... can lead to mistaken conclusions.  Or something
else less emotionally charged than "laughable."

Glenn


On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 10:47 AM Sam Lanfranco <sam at lanfranco.net> wrote:

> The wording looks good to me.
>
> Sam
>
> Internet Elder, Internet Ecologist, 416 816-2852
> On Apr 6, 2023, at 01:46, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> wrote:
>>
>> We have put together a draft response on the GNSO
>> Statement of Interest Task Force (SOI-TF). We need
>> to submit our response by tomorrow (Friday 7 April).
>> Please feel free to comment or add.
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rmJPMhoTWEh37Ewh-ticj7WMgwcQQ7VMZkzIHLlbCVs/edit
>>
>> Please note that the BC has specifically mentioned us in
>> their response, so we feel the need to address that.
>>
>>  Julf
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20230406/d6026162/attachment.htm>