SOI Task Force response

[Olévié A. A Kouami]

+1 @Glenn
Loughable is hidden something not really clear :-)
 It's better to avoid such a word.
My 2 cents.
Olévié

Le jeu. 6 avr. 2023, 22:22, Glenn Ricart <gricart at gmail.com> a écrit :

> I would not use the "charged" term "laughable".  I might say that
> conflating ... and .... can lead to mistaken conclusions.  Or something
> else less emotionally charged than "laughable."
>
> Glenn
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 10:47 AM Sam Lanfranco <sam at lanfranco.net> wrote:
>
>> The wording looks good to me.
>>
>> Sam
>>
>> Internet Elder, Internet Ecologist, 416 816-2852
>> On Apr 6, 2023, at 01:46, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We have put together a draft response on the GNSO
>>> Statement of Interest Task Force (SOI-TF). We need
>>> to submit our response by tomorrow (Friday 7 April).
>>> Please feel free to comment or add.
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rmJPMhoTWEh37Ewh-ticj7WMgwcQQ7VMZkzIHLlbCVs/edit
>>>
>>> Please note that the BC has specifically mentioned us in
>>> their response, so we feel the need to address that.
>>>
>>>  Julf
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20230406/e6f98d19/attachment.htm>