NCSG Minority report on the EPDP phase 2a final report

[farzaneh badii]

alternatively... we can send what Steph and Man-Ju have written (with some
tweaks) to the Board and every other stakeholder and tell them: hey look,
we have issues with the report too but we compromise.

I don't agree with a few things in the letter though. Like this one: "The
contracted parties know best their own legal risk, and since they are the
controllers and responsible for any fines which might come as a result
of enforcement
action, they must be free to decide how to manage the disclosure of
customer information."

It's too absolute.


Farzaneh


On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 1:47 PM Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:

> Here's a proposed minority statement:
>
> The NCSG is apparently of the minority view that minority statements
> attempting to "spin" the meaning of the final report or reiterating
> arguments that have been held endlessly are not constructive and we all
> need to shut up and end this thing.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> on behalf of
> Mueller, Milton L <milton at GATECH.EDU>
> *Sent:* Friday, September 10, 2021 1:34 PM
> *To:* NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
> *Subject:* Re: NCSG Minority report on the EPDP phase 2a final report
>
>
>
> > So is everybody (all the stakeholders) each filing a minority report?
> Then how is that a minority report… maybe they should call it something
> else…
>
> I've got some ideas for what to call it...
>  - Get the last wordism
>  - Blather
>  - Spin doctoring
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20210910/d684225c/attachment.htm>