NCSG Minority report on the EPDP phase 2a final report

[Stephanie Perrin]

Fair point Farzi, would it be ok to say “ought to know best” ?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 10, 2021, at 13:54, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> alternatively... we can send what Steph and Man-Ju have written (with some tweaks) to the Board and every other stakeholder and tell them: hey look, we have issues with the report too but we compromise. 
> 
> I don't agree with a few things in the letter though. Like this one: "The contracted parties know best their own legal risk, and since they are the controllers and responsible for any fines which might come as a result of enforcement action, they must be free to decide how to manage the disclosure of customer information."
> 
> It's too absolute.
> 
> 
> Farzaneh 
> 
> 
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 1:47 PM Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
>> Here's a proposed minority statement:
>> 
>> The NCSG is apparently of the minority view that minority statements attempting to "spin" the meaning of the final report or reiterating arguments that have been held endlessly are not constructive and we all need to shut up and end this thing.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> on behalf of Mueller, Milton L <milton at GATECH.EDU>
>> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 1:34 PM
>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
>> Subject: Re: NCSG Minority report on the EPDP phase 2a final report
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> > So is everybody (all the stakeholders) each filing a minority report? Then how is that a minority report… maybe they should call it something else…  
>> 
>> I've got some ideas for what to call it...
>>  - Get the last wordism
>>  - Blather
>>  - Spin doctoring
>> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20210910/bc4462ec/attachment.htm>