[SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] ICANN69 Plenary Topic Proposals (3 submissions for review)

[Stephanie Perrin]

There are potentially three slots at this moment.

In my opinion, we have a deep interest in the economics of the DNS 
industry.  First of all, affordability of domain names for mere 
non=commercial folks like us depends on a flourishing industry.  
Burdening the CPS with a lot admin, duties, fees for running a giant 
EPDP system for disclosure, etc. ultimately means higher prices for the 
domain names.  Secondly, ICANN resources are totally dependent on a tax 
on DNS registration revenues. Continued growth of ICANN Org, unnecessary 
expenses, all impact whether we get support as a community, and whether 
we can afford domain names.

I hope this is clear. There are lots of countries with no local 
registrars, that is also a big issue in my opinion.

cheers Stephanie

On 2020-08-13 1:27 p.m., Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele wrote:
> @James, I thought we are non commercial group. We should not be much 
> interested in commercial drivers in option one. My argument could be 
> flawed but I stand corrected that this should be the focus BC will be 
> pushing for.
>
> I'd like to go with option 3. I feel multistakeholderism in options 2 
> has been overflogged as a thematic focus.
>
> Caleb Ogundele
>
> ________________
>
> Sent with thumbs from a small screen mobile device.
>
> Pelase exsuce typos adn errosr.
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 8:06 AM James Gannon <lists at icann.guru> wrote:
>
>     1. The Domain Name Services Marketplace (Market dynamics, business
>     models and commercial drivers)
>
>     For me.
>
>     ---
>
>     *James Gannon*
>
>     *From: *NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>     <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>> on behalf of U Of T
>     <stephanie.perrin at MAIL.UTORONTO.CA
>     <mailto:stephanie.perrin at MAIL.UTORONTO.CA>>
>     *Reply to: *U Of T <stephanie.perrin at MAIL.UTORONTO.CA
>     <mailto:stephanie.perrin at MAIL.UTORONTO.CA>>
>     *Date: *Wednesday, 12 August 2020 at 22:56
>     *To: *"NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>     <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>"
>     <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
>     *Subject: *Fwd: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] ICANN69
>     Plenary Topic Proposals (3 submissions for review)
>
>
>     As you can see, there are three plenary sessions on the table for
>     the next ICANN public meeting.  Your thoughts and proposals are
>     welcome; preferably in the next 14 hours.
>
>     Thanks!
>
>     Stephanie Perrin
>
>     Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>     Begin forwarded message:
>
>         *From:* "Tanzanica S. King" <tanzanica.king at icann.org
>         <mailto:tanzanica.king at icann.org>>
>         *Date:* August 12, 2020 at 15:14:19 EDT
>         *To:* SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
>         <soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org
>         <mailto:soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>>
>         *Subject:* *[SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] ICANN69
>         Plenary Topic Proposals (3 submissions for review)*
>
>         
>
>         Dear Community Leaders:
>
>         We now have a total of three topic proposals for plenary
>         sessions during ICANN69. The proposed topics are:
>
>         1. The Domain Name Services Marketplace (Market dynamics,
>         business models and commercial drivers)
>
>         2. Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder
>         Model: A Way Forward
>
>         3. Domain Name System Abuse: Practical Solutions
>
>         The detailed proposals are attached for your review before our
>         upcoming call tomorrow.
>
>         Best regards,
>
>         Tanzanica
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         Tanzanica S. King
>
>         Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design
>
>         ICANN
>
>         Office   +1 310 301 5800
>
>         Mobile  +1 310 995 3038
>
>         www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200813/cb09fcf9/attachment.htm>