NCSG comments on IPC/BC accreditation model

[farzaneh badii]

Thanks everyone.

I sent this letter to the CEO, Board chair, ICANN staff members involved
with this as well as ICANN GDPR email address for submitting comments.

Best

Farzaneh

Farzaneh

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This looks very good to me. Congratulations to everyone involved. I would
> support approving it.
>
> Best,
>
> Michael
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:46 PM, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Here is the response to IPC/BC proposed model. As you know IPC/BC came up
>> with this model and now seeking comments.
>>
>> Although this process is not an ICANN process, we need to voice our
>> concern to ICANN and state what we think WHOIS purpose is. Kathy Kleiman
>> was the penholder and the document has gone through review of PC. we need
>> to approve this soon, perhaps within 12 hours, if there are objections
>> please raise soon. If we have to prolong it, then we won't submit before
>> the meeting they are going to hold.
>>
>> This was, unfortunately, a distraction. But the document we have can be
>> improved later for a statement of NCSG opinion on WHOIS purpose.
>>
>> Best
>>
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180409/7a0d54d1/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NCSG Comments to Draft IPC_BC Purpose Statement April-2018.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 458099 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180409/7a0d54d1/attachment.pdf>