NCSG comments on IPC/BC accreditation model

[Elsa S]

Such an elaborate and well-written statement. Thank you for the strong
wording, and high standard you are setting.

Best,

Elsa
--

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:31 PM, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks everyone.
>
> I sent this letter to the CEO, Board chair, ICANN staff members involved
> with this as well as ICANN GDPR email address for submitting comments.
>
> Best
>
> Farzaneh
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Michael Karanicolas <
> mkaranicolas at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This looks very good to me. Congratulations to everyone involved. I would
>> support approving it.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:46 PM, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Here is the response to IPC/BC proposed model. As you know IPC/BC came
>>> up with this model and now seeking comments.
>>>
>>> Although this process is not an ICANN process, we need to voice our
>>> concern to ICANN and state what we think WHOIS purpose is. Kathy Kleiman
>>> was the penholder and the document has gone through review of PC. we need
>>> to approve this soon, perhaps within 12 hours, if there are objections
>>> please raise soon. If we have to prolong it, then we won't submit before
>>> the meeting they are going to hold.
>>>
>>> This was, unfortunately, a distraction. But the document we have can be
>>> improved later for a statement of NCSG opinion on WHOIS purpose.
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
--

Elsa Saade
Consultant
Gulf Centre for Human Rights
Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180409/61717189/attachment.htm>