NCSG comments on IPC/BC accreditation model
Michael Karanicolas
mkaranicolas at GMAIL.COM
Fri Apr 6 09:22:51 EEST 2018
Hi,
This looks very good to me. Congratulations to everyone involved. I would
support approving it.
Best,
Michael
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:46 PM, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
wrote:
> All,
>
> Here is the response to IPC/BC proposed model. As you know IPC/BC came up
> with this model and now seeking comments.
>
> Although this process is not an ICANN process, we need to voice our
> concern to ICANN and state what we think WHOIS purpose is. Kathy Kleiman
> was the penholder and the document has gone through review of PC. we need
> to approve this soon, perhaps within 12 hours, if there are objections
> please raise soon. If we have to prolong it, then we won't submit before
> the meeting they are going to hold.
>
> This was, unfortunately, a distraction. But the document we have can be
> improved later for a statement of NCSG opinion on WHOIS purpose.
>
> Best
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180406/306d1886/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list