NCSG comments on IPC/BC accreditation model

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

Thanks, Farzaneh for sharing this,
in term of process, the Policy Committee received the draft lately doing a
review and editing it, to decide on the endorsement of the comment.  The
whole GDPR saga and the "non-process" imposed those constraints to be able
to input quickly and be reactive.

Best,

Rafik


2018-04-06 9:46 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>:

> All,
>
> Here is the response to IPC/BC proposed model. As you know IPC/BC came up
> with this model and now seeking comments.
>
> Although this process is not an ICANN process, we need to voice our
> concern to ICANN and state what we think WHOIS purpose is. Kathy Kleiman
> was the penholder and the document has gone through review of PC. we need
> to approve this soon, perhaps within 12 hours, if there are objections
> please raise soon. If we have to prolong it, then we won't submit before
> the meeting they are going to hold.
>
> This was, unfortunately, a distraction. But the document we have can be
> improved later for a statement of NCSG opinion on WHOIS purpose.
>
> Best
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180405/24f87edc/attachment.htm>