ICANN has appointed a Chief Data Protection Officer
Baudouin SCHOMBE
b.schombe at GMAIL.COM
Mon Jul 31 08:25:54 EEST 2017
Strongly agreed Stéphanie, it's a very big concern. As a result of small
investigations, some registrars or resellers have improvised themselves by
selling the domain name countries at high costs and others have become
registrars or resellers for certain political platforms to precisely have
access to data Confidential or deprived of their political opponents or of
any persons hunted down.
It so revolted me and I denounced to some judicial authorities but
unfortunately I became a count that I dared to introduce my hand into a bee
hive.
I do not give up.
*SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN*
*SECRETAIRE EXECUTIF FGI-IGF RDC*
*COORDINATION NATIONALE CAFECICANN/AFRALO Member*
*ISOC Member*
Téléphone mobile:+243998983491/+243813684512
email : b.schombe at gmail.com
skype : b.schombe
blog : http://akimambo.unblog.fr
2017-07-31 14:09 GMT+01:00 Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>:
> This is a great point Baudouin. I raised the matter of accrediting those
> who purport to be working on cybercrime or investigations on the RDS
> discussion a while ago, and got pretty well attacked....but I stick to my
> guns. If a person or group is a legitimate contractor working on
> cybercrime, or a law enforcement body, they should have some kind of
> official recognition in order to get the detailed personal information they
> want. Why should a reseller be forced to accept some stranger's word for
> who they are? Accreditation is a two way street....
>
> Stephanie Perrin
>
> On 2017-07-31 09:03, Baudouin SCHOMBE wrote:
>
> Indeed, Kris, I agree with you on this point. You have just awakened my
> attention by this observation. At the local level, this could enable us to
> solve the problems of registrars not accredited and who abound in the
> country at the risk of deliveries the personal data to any person
> pretending to be of the intelligence service.
>
>
> *SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN *
>
> *SECRETAIRE EXECUTIF FGI-IGF RDC *
>
>
> *COORDINATION NATIONALE CAFEC ICANN/AFRALO Member *
> *ISOC Member*
> Téléphone mobile:+243998983491 <0998%20983%20491>/+243813684512
> <0813%20684%20512>
> email : b.schombe at gmail.com
> skype : b.schombe
> blog : http://akimambo.unblog.fr
>
>
>
>
> 2017-07-31 13:42 GMT+01:00 Kris Seeburn <seeburn.k at gmail.com>:
>
>> To the point….but i guess since the CDPO has been appointed he would need
>> to look and be able to advise on public view of data in the whois for
>> example. I am sure we need the correct and validated details of anyone who
>> registers to have them on Data base but some information coming from
>> special request like authorities needs a different access. Based on who and
>> what the subject of the issue comes to be.
>>
>> You have valid points which everyone must come to a middle ground to
>> succeed Privacy laws and certainly GDPR is going to affect many dealings
>> with EU be it online or cloud.The challenges are gona need to happen not
>> only within the groups but affects ICANN directly.
>>
>> But looks like stephanie has provided some more background. The bigger
>> question is that whatever happens we all need to tie down to GDPR else no
>> business at all and no safe harbor.
>>
>> My acid test here is to see what the new Chief brings in. He should be
>> able to look at everything and have guidelines for all groups and for ICANN
>> as well.
>>
>> Kris
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 4:24 PM, Ade Bo <adebodea at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Has anyone thought how are these changes going to influence cybercrime?
>> How much harder is it going to be to find information necessary to
>> prosecute someone?
>> We are thinking of protecting privacy but isn’t there nothing
>> contradicting that ?
>> I believe these matter should be looked at from all the stakeholders
>> perspective.
>>
>> With kind regards
>>
>> Adela Bodea
>>
>> "The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination”
>> Albert Einstein
>>
>> On 31 Jul 2017, at 14:06, Michael Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I agree too Stephanie, excellent points David.
>>
>> Would anyone support us as the NCSG requesting a formal response to
>> David's points (and a formal explanation as to the motivation behind Mr.
>> Halloran's appointment)?
>>
>> Best,
>> -Michael
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Stephanie Perrin <
>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> I totally agree David, and as someone who last worked in risk
>>> management, if I were the CEO looking at this mess right now I would be
>>> asking hard questions of the people who have advised the Board to just
>>> ignore the data protection commissioners for the past 17 years. First
>>> position paper on WHOIS being illegal was in 2000. Makes a heck of an easy
>>> case to take to Court....
>>>
>>> Stephanie Perrin
>>>
>>> On 2017-07-31 03:33, David Cake wrote:
>>>
>>> I admit I find this development disappointing.
>>> While it is a sign (along with the GDPR task force established at the
>>> last meeting) that ICANN has finally understood the significance of its
>>> downplaying and avoidance of the GDPR and other international data
>>> protection law over the last few years, it is disappointing that:
>>> a) ICANN is still not taking the issue that seriously, as it is in
>>> addition to existing Deputy General Counsel duties, so represents a limited
>>> allocation of resources to the issue;
>>> b) is a missed opportunity to bring additional experience and expertise
>>> into the organisation, expertise ICANN desperately needs (and is currently
>>> relying on its volunteers to provide);
>>> c) is continuing to the have the issue managed by the same team whose
>>> denial and obstinate avoidance of the issue has led to the organisation now
>>> facing a crisis;
>>> d) continues a pattern of having ICANN legal be put in charge of areas
>>> where it is largely responsible for continued organisation dysfunction, so
>>> effectively being given the opportunity to manage criticism but not given
>>> any strong inventive to admit to past mistakes. .
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29 Jul 2017, at 3:32 am, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> ICANN has now appointed someone
>>> <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/introducing-icann-s-chief-data-protection-officer-cdpo>
>>> to the role of "Chief Data Protection Officer". Daniel Halloran, who in his
>>> bio is described as "one of ICANN's longest-serving employees" and reports
>>> directly to John Jeffrey, does not list his experience in establishing
>>> privacy frameworks nor their associated compliance structures in his bio.
>>> That said, I wish him all the best in this new role and look forward to
>>> seeing how ICANN's understanding of data protection law evolves over the
>>> coming months now that this position has been created...
>>>
>>> Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Kris Seeburn
>> seeburn.k at gmail.com
>>
>> - www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170731/6763109f/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list