Public comments on IRP rules

[Aarti Bhavana]

The Sidley memo was shared on the IOT mailing list:
https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iot/attachments/20170106/9dcc4fb4/Sidley-ResponsetoCertifiedQuestionofCCWGIRPIoT-January42017-0001.pdf




Aarti Bhavana | Program Officer
Centre for Communication Governance | National Law University, Delhi |
Sector-14,
Dwarka, New Delhi - 110078 | Fax: (+91) 11-280-34256 | www.ccgdelhi.org .
www.ccgtlr.org <http://www.ccgdelhi.org/> .
*https://ccgnludelhi.wordpress.com/author/aartibhavana/
<https://ccgnludelhi.wordpress.com/author/aartibhavana/>*|

On 18 January 2017 at 22:51, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:

> I have incorporated the legal analysis from Sidley Austin LLP into our
> public comments. Gratifyingly, their legal analysis of the supplementary
> IRP rules totally supports our concerns about the time limits.
> One question for the crowd: I got my hands on the Sidley comments in my
> email box - are these comments posted anywhere so the NCSG comments can
> link to them?
>
> Thanks to all of you who contributed to these comments. I have now edited
> them, accepting most of the amendments proposed by members and adding a
> title and such. I would ask the Policy Committee to do what it needs to do
> to conclude the filing of these comments.
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TMI2n_EgBDVTSUZm2Xwl7SSHWks9Hz076NQG
> fsXxqso/
>
> Dr. Milton L Mueller
> Professor, School of Public Policy
> Georgia Institute of Technology
> Internet Governance Project
> http://internetgovernance.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170118/2f2259c7/attachment.htm>