Public comments on IRP rules

[farzaneh badii]

Thanks everyone for commenting on this document. We have now resolved all
the comments, accepted additions  and it will be submitted to PC for
approval. PDF of what we will submit to NCSG PC is attached.



Farzaneh

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Aarti Bhavana <aarti.bhavana at nludelhi.ac.in
> wrote:

> The Sidley memo was shared on the IOT mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/
> pipermail/iot/attachments/20170106/9dcc4fb4/Sidley-
> ResponsetoCertifiedQuestionofCCWGIRPIoT-January42017-0001.pdf
>
>
>
> Aarti Bhavana | Program Officer
> Centre for Communication Governance | National Law University, Delhi | Sector-14,
> Dwarka, New Delhi - 110078 | Fax: (+91) 11-280-34256 | www.ccgdelhi.org .
> www.ccgtlr.org <http://www.ccgdelhi.org/> . *https://ccgnludelhi.wordpress.com/author/aartibhavana/
> <https://ccgnludelhi.wordpress.com/author/aartibhavana/>*|
>
> On 18 January 2017 at 22:51, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
>
>> I have incorporated the legal analysis from Sidley Austin LLP into our
>> public comments. Gratifyingly, their legal analysis of the supplementary
>> IRP rules totally supports our concerns about the time limits.
>> One question for the crowd: I got my hands on the Sidley comments in my
>> email box - are these comments posted anywhere so the NCSG comments can
>> link to them?
>>
>> Thanks to all of you who contributed to these comments. I have now edited
>> them, accepting most of the amendments proposed by members and adding a
>> title and such. I would ask the Policy Committee to do what it needs to do
>> to conclude the filing of these comments.
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TMI2n_EgBDVTSUZm2Xwl7SSH
>> Wks9Hz076NQGfsXxqso/
>>
>> Dr. Milton L Mueller
>> Professor, School of Public Policy
>> Georgia Institute of Technology
>> Internet Governance Project
>> http://internetgovernance.org/
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170120/a72c92a5/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: IndependentReviewProcess-NCSGPublicComment (1).pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 127347 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170120/a72c92a5/attachment.pdf>