[Public Comment] Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report

[Kris Seeburn]

Hi Rafik,

Count me in as well.

> On Aug 19, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Yazid AKANHO <000005822b0a832e-dmarc-request at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> wrote:
> 
> Hello Rafik,
> I also volunteer to work on it.
> 
> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
> Le jeu., août 10, 2017 à 1:12, Rafik Dammak
> <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> a écrit :
> Hi all,
> 
> there is a new public comment about the Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en>). We had a discussion in Johannesburg meeting regarding the rise of anti-abuse topic and expressed concerns from a rights standpoint. 
> The study will also feed the work of the  Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice review team.
> 
> From the description page:
> 
> "The study provides measures and analysis of:
> Absolute counts of abusive domains per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
> Abuse rates, based on an "abused domains per 10,000" ratio (as a normalization factor to account for different  TLD  sizes), per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
> Abuse associated with privacy and proxy services
> Geographic locations associated with abusive activities
> Abuse levels distinguished by "maliciously registered" versus "compromised" domains
> Effects of  DNSSEC, domain parking, and registration restrictions on abuse levels"
> we should review the report and if need our comment as NCSG. please let me know if you want to volunteer to review the report and draft a comment.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rafik
>  
> 
> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
> Le jeu., août 10, 2017 à 1:12, Rafik Dammak
> <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> a écrit :
> Hi all,
> 
> there is a new public comment about the Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en>). We had a discussion in Johannesburg meeting regarding the rise of anti-abuse topic and expressed concerns from a rights standpoint. 
> The study will also feed the work of the  Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice review team.
> 
> From the description page:
> 
> "The study provides measures and analysis of:
> Absolute counts of abusive domains per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
> Abuse rates, based on an "abused domains per 10,000" ratio (as a normalization factor to account for different  TLD  sizes), per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
> Abuse associated with privacy and proxy services
> Geographic locations associated with abusive activities
> Abuse levels distinguished by "maliciously registered" versus "compromised" domains
> Effects of  DNSSEC, domain parking, and registration restrictions on abuse levels"
> we should review the report and if need our comment as NCSG. please let me know if you want to volunteer to review the report and draft a comment.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rafik
>  
> 
> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
> Le jeu., août 10, 2017 à 1:12, Rafik Dammak
> <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> a écrit :
> Hi all,
> 
> there is a new public comment about the Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en>). We had a discussion in Johannesburg meeting regarding the rise of anti-abuse topic and expressed concerns from a rights standpoint. 
> The study will also feed the work of the  Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice review team.
> 
> From the description page:
> 
> "The study provides measures and analysis of:
> Absolute counts of abusive domains per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
> Abuse rates, based on an "abused domains per 10,000" ratio (as a normalization factor to account for different  TLD  sizes), per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
> Abuse associated with privacy and proxy services
> Geographic locations associated with abusive activities
> Abuse levels distinguished by "maliciously registered" versus "compromised" domains
> Effects of  DNSSEC, domain parking, and registration restrictions on abuse levels"
> we should review the report and if need our comment as NCSG. please let me know if you want to volunteer to review the report and draft a comment.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rafik
>  
> 
> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
> Le jeu., août 10, 2017 à 1:12, Rafik Dammak
> <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> a écrit :
> Hi all,
> 
> there is a new public comment about the Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en>). We had a discussion in Johannesburg meeting regarding the rise of anti-abuse topic and expressed concerns from a rights standpoint. 
> The study will also feed the work of the  Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice review team.
> 
> From the description page:
> 
> "The study provides measures and analysis of:
> Absolute counts of abusive domains per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
> Abuse rates, based on an "abused domains per 10,000" ratio (as a normalization factor to account for different  TLD  sizes), per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
> Abuse associated with privacy and proxy services
> Geographic locations associated with abusive activities
> Abuse levels distinguished by "maliciously registered" versus "compromised" domains
> Effects of  DNSSEC, domain parking, and registration restrictions on abuse levels"
> we should review the report and if need our comment as NCSG. please let me know if you want to volunteer to review the report and draft a comment.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rafik
>  

Kris Seeburn
seeburn.k at gmail.com
www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/>




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170819/d8961446/attachment.htm>