Re=?UTF-8?Q?=C2=A0=3A=5BPublic_?=Comment] Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report

[Yazid AKANHO]

Hello Rafik,I also volunteer to work on it.

Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., août 10, 2017 à 1:12, Rafik Dammak<rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> a écrit :   Hi all,
there is a new public comment about the Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en). We had a discussion in Johannesburg meeting regarding the rise of anti-abuse topic and expressed concerns from a rights standpoint. The study will also feed the work of the  Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice review team.
>From the description page:
"The study provides measures and analysis of:   
   - Absolute counts of abusive domains per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
   - Abuse rates, based on an "abused domains per 10,000" ratio (as a normalization factor to account for different  TLD  sizes), per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
   - Abuse associated with privacy and proxy services
   - Geographic locations associated with abusive activities
   - Abuse levels distinguished by "maliciously registered" versus "compromised" domains
   - Effects of  DNSSEC, domain parking, and registration restrictions on abuse levels"
we should review the report and if need our comment as NCSG. please let me know if you want to volunteer to review the report and draft a comment.   

Best,   

   
Rafik
   

Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., août 10, 2017 à 1:12, Rafik Dammak<rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> a écrit :   Hi all,
there is a new public comment about the Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en). We had a discussion in Johannesburg meeting regarding the rise of anti-abuse topic and expressed concerns from a rights standpoint. The study will also feed the work of the  Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice review team.
>From the description page:
"The study provides measures and analysis of:   
   - Absolute counts of abusive domains per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
   - Abuse rates, based on an "abused domains per 10,000" ratio (as a normalization factor to account for different  TLD  sizes), per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
   - Abuse associated with privacy and proxy services
   - Geographic locations associated with abusive activities
   - Abuse levels distinguished by "maliciously registered" versus "compromised" domains
   - Effects of  DNSSEC, domain parking, and registration restrictions on abuse levels"
we should review the report and if need our comment as NCSG. please let me know if you want to volunteer to review the report and draft a comment.   

Best,   

   
Rafik
   

Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., août 10, 2017 à 1:12, Rafik Dammak<rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> a écrit :   Hi all,
there is a new public comment about the Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en). We had a discussion in Johannesburg meeting regarding the rise of anti-abuse topic and expressed concerns from a rights standpoint. The study will also feed the work of the  Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice review team.
>From the description page:
"The study provides measures and analysis of:   
   - Absolute counts of abusive domains per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
   - Abuse rates, based on an "abused domains per 10,000" ratio (as a normalization factor to account for different  TLD  sizes), per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
   - Abuse associated with privacy and proxy services
   - Geographic locations associated with abusive activities
   - Abuse levels distinguished by "maliciously registered" versus "compromised" domains
   - Effects of  DNSSEC, domain parking, and registration restrictions on abuse levels"
we should review the report and if need our comment as NCSG. please let me know if you want to volunteer to review the report and draft a comment.   

Best,   

   
Rafik
   

Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., août 10, 2017 à 1:12, Rafik Dammak<rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> a écrit :   Hi all,
there is a new public comment about the Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en). We had a discussion in Johannesburg meeting regarding the rise of anti-abuse topic and expressed concerns from a rights standpoint. The study will also feed the work of the  Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice review team.
>From the description page:
"The study provides measures and analysis of:   
   - Absolute counts of abusive domains per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
   - Abuse rates, based on an "abused domains per 10,000" ratio (as a normalization factor to account for different  TLD  sizes), per  gTLD  and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
   - Abuse associated with privacy and proxy services
   - Geographic locations associated with abusive activities
   - Abuse levels distinguished by "maliciously registered" versus "compromised" domains
   - Effects of  DNSSEC, domain parking, and registration restrictions on abuse levels"
we should review the report and if need our comment as NCSG. please let me know if you want to volunteer to review the report and draft a comment.   

Best,   

   
Rafik
   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170819/a6f68908/attachment.htm>