Re=?utf-8?Q?=C2=A0=3A=5BPublic_?=Comment] Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report
Oliana Sula
olasula at HOTMAIL.COM.AR
Sat Aug 19 06:14:36 EEST 2017
Hello everyone,
I can volunteer for it.
Best,
Olya
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 19 août 2017 à 11:49, Yazid AKANHO <000005822b0a832e-dmarc-request at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:000005822b0a832e-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu>> a écrit :
Hello Rafik,
I also volunteer to work on it.
Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android<https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
Le jeu., août 10, 2017 à 1:12, Rafik Dammak
<rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM<mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> a écrit :
Hi all,
there is a new public comment about the Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en). We had a discussion in Johannesburg meeting regarding the rise of anti-abuse topic and expressed concerns from a rights standpoint.
The study will also feed the work of the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice review team.
From the description page:
"The study provides measures and analysis of:
* Absolute counts of abusive domains per gTLD and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
* Abuse rates, based on an "abused domains per 10,000" ratio (as a normalization factor to account for different TLD sizes), per gTLD and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
* Abuse associated with privacy and proxy services
* Geographic locations associated with abusive activities
* Abuse levels distinguished by "maliciously registered" versus "compromised" domains
* Effects of DNSSEC, domain parking, and registration restrictions on abuse levels"
we should review the report and if need our comment as NCSG. please let me know if you want to volunteer to review the report and draft a comment.
Best,
Rafik
Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android<https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
Le jeu., août 10, 2017 à 1:12, Rafik Dammak
<rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM<mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> a écrit :
Hi all,
there is a new public comment about the Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en). We had a discussion in Johannesburg meeting regarding the rise of anti-abuse topic and expressed concerns from a rights standpoint.
The study will also feed the work of the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice review team.
From the description page:
"The study provides measures and analysis of:
* Absolute counts of abusive domains per gTLD and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
* Abuse rates, based on an "abused domains per 10,000" ratio (as a normalization factor to account for different TLD sizes), per gTLD and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
* Abuse associated with privacy and proxy services
* Geographic locations associated with abusive activities
* Abuse levels distinguished by "maliciously registered" versus "compromised" domains
* Effects of DNSSEC, domain parking, and registration restrictions on abuse levels"
we should review the report and if need our comment as NCSG. please let me know if you want to volunteer to review the report and draft a comment.
Best,
Rafik
Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android<https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
Le jeu., août 10, 2017 à 1:12, Rafik Dammak
<rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM<mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> a écrit :
Hi all,
there is a new public comment about the Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en). We had a discussion in Johannesburg meeting regarding the rise of anti-abuse topic and expressed concerns from a rights standpoint.
The study will also feed the work of the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice review team.
From the description page:
"The study provides measures and analysis of:
* Absolute counts of abusive domains per gTLD and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
* Abuse rates, based on an "abused domains per 10,000" ratio (as a normalization factor to account for different TLD sizes), per gTLD and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
* Abuse associated with privacy and proxy services
* Geographic locations associated with abusive activities
* Abuse levels distinguished by "maliciously registered" versus "compromised" domains
* Effects of DNSSEC, domain parking, and registration restrictions on abuse levels"
we should review the report and if need our comment as NCSG. please let me know if you want to volunteer to review the report and draft a comment.
Best,
Rafik
Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android<https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
Le jeu., août 10, 2017 à 1:12, Rafik Dammak
<rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM<mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> a écrit :
Hi all,
there is a new public comment about the Statistical Analysis of DNS Abuse in gTLDs (SADAG) Report (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/sadag-final-2017-08-09-en). We had a discussion in Johannesburg meeting regarding the rise of anti-abuse topic and expressed concerns from a rights standpoint.
The study will also feed the work of the Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice review team.
From the description page:
"The study provides measures and analysis of:
* Absolute counts of abusive domains per gTLD and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
* Abuse rates, based on an "abused domains per 10,000" ratio (as a normalization factor to account for different TLD sizes), per gTLD and registrar from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2016
* Abuse associated with privacy and proxy services
* Geographic locations associated with abusive activities
* Abuse levels distinguished by "maliciously registered" versus "compromised" domains
* Effects of DNSSEC, domain parking, and registration restrictions on abuse levels"
we should review the report and if need our comment as NCSG. please let me know if you want to volunteer to review the report and draft a comment.
Best,
Rafik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170819/b462bf38/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list